Home

  • Assassination of Qasem Soleimani and the Dubious Mask of Iran


    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

    Assassination of Qasem Soleimani and the Dubious Mask of Iran

    On 03 Jan 2020, United States (US) through an airstrike killed Qasem Soleimani, Iranian Major General of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) since 1998, and the commander of Quds Force (known for its extraterritorial military and clandestine operations) who was considered to be the second most powerful person in Iran next to Sayyid Ali Hosseini Khamenei, current Supreme Leader of Iran. Iran responded to it through a military operation called Operation Martyr Soleimani by launching numerous ballistic missiles at the Ayn al-Asad Airbase in Al Anbar Governorate, Western Iraq, and at an airbase in Erbil, Iraqi Kurdistan. This attack resulted in no casualties and didn’t make any kind of significant impact on the US. This event has attained global media attention as a great threat to the world and hyped that it could trigger World War III.

    Therefore, it is necessary for the Muslim Ummah to know how to look at this event and the reality behind it, instead of falling into an emotion based general viewpoint to be carried away by the hype.

    The general viewpoint is developed, firstly, based on the emotions emanating on exposure to the news and hype hovering around the global media with the rhetoric speeches by leaders of US and Iran of attacking each other and the views of the world countries. Secondly, the great passion of the Muslim Ummah for Islam drives them to this general viewpoint that Iran is the only Muslim nation which stands against the US on face to face basis due to the responsive attacks by Iran on US. This general viewpoint simply provides an exaggerated elevated position to Iran than the reality and same trend is followed in similar issues in the world.

    Moreover, it can be seen that despite the fact that the leaders from both sides have directly expressed their clear intentions of deescalating tensions and to give up the attacks, the Muslim Ummah develops a general viewpoint that there is a chance for world war III and Iran is the only Muslim nation to oppose and combat US. This view is a result of shallow or superficial political thinking which drives the Ummah to an illusionary world.

    So, Muslim Ummah should be reminded that political awareness is a must and it is an essential aspect to stabilize Muslim Ummah especially after the loss of our Islamic Khilafah and also to work for its reestablishment which ensures the continuation of the mission of our Prophet Muhammad (saw) as commanded by Allah (swt). By realizing the importance of assigning weightage to the political awareness while assessing the global events with particular angle and with deep insights into them, the Muslim Ummah can comprehend the reality and attain further clarity on all such events.

    Therefore, to arrive at the specific political viewpoint on killing of Qasem Soleimani, it is necessary to focus, with political insight, on why killing Qasem Soleimani and that too why at this point of time. The specific political viewpoint can be arrived at by studying the ongoing anti-government protests in Iran, Iraq and Lebanon, the US policies and stance on these countries, -more specifically on Iran in this case the role of US in the formation of Constitution / Parliament of Iraq- the objectives of establishing such government and the role of Qasem Soleimani in the joint operations with US to attack Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq.

    Firstly, there have been a massive on-going anti-government protests happening in Iran, Iraq and Lebanon. Even three months before the killing of Qasem Soleimani, there have been large-scale protests going on in Iran, Iraq and Lebanon against their present government regimes due to dissatisfaction on them over various issues including economic issues. The intensity of the protests can be sensed through the killing of the protestors of around 1500 in Iran, more than 500 in Iraq and also in Lebanon. Under these circumstances, as an extension of regular containment activities, Qasem Soleimani and a few other armed personals of Iran have been killed in this US strike. Just by relating these events, even without getting into details, the Muslim Ummah can attain clarity on the issue.

    Even before taking the stance of killing Qasem Soleimani, three different stances of US on Iran were prevailing among the political leaders & advisors of US. One is to declare war on Iran; second is to change the regime; third is to contain the functions and actions of Iran to keep it under its dominion. But, the US has set aside the first two stances and adopted the third stance of containing Iran to keep it under its control without going for a war and without a regime change. Therefore, to achieve this objective, the US had done the airstrikes and the killing of Qasem Soleimani, since this only can defuse the anti-government protests and stabilize the present regimes in Iran and Iraq and keep them under its control to continue its benefits there. This incidentally happens to be a benefit to the present government in Iran for its stabilization and continuation of its regime by winning the hearts of the protesting people with their responsive strikes over US and posing themselves as protector of the people and a great Muslim country to stand in opposition to the global power US.

    This leads to a question why to kill Qasem Soleimani. To understand this, it is important to know the role of Qasem Soleimani and Iran in joint military operations with the US to execute attacks in Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq. This is evident based on candid statements of the government officials and leaders. The earlier leader Mohammad Khatami had stated that Saddam Hussein was their greatest enemy and their objective was to destroy Saddam Hussein. So he had asked the US to carry out joint operations in Iraq as they already did in Afghanistan. From this, it is established that they have also carried out joint operations in Afghanistan. Further, a CIA expert had also stated the same thing that Iran had joined hands with US for its Operation freedom in 2001 during the onset of the ‘war on terror’ and attacks inside Afghanistan. These things establish the fact that Iran has done joint operations with the US in the attacks in Iraq and in Afghanistan. Similarly, in Syria, it was very clearly known that Iran was one among many who supported the US to strengthen the government of Bashar al-Assad. Therefore, it is evidently established that Iran had joined with the US to execute attacks in Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq. In all these actions of US against the three Muslim countries, Iran was the key player in executing the agenda of US and the main role in all operations was played by Qasem Soleimani. There are much evidence available to prove the same and one such evidence is that the role of Qasem Soleimani as the commander in Northern Iraq attacks on ISIS by the US. This role of Qasem Soleimani in executing the agenda of the US was undeniable.

    But, as earlier stated, the present stance of US is to contain Iran so that they continue to attain benefits from that region and it can be achieved by extending the present regime of Iran by defusing the anti-governments protests of the people by staging events which paint an image to the present government as powerful in opposing US. Among such staged events was the killing of Qasem Soleimani, since the US felt that Qasem Soleimani was crossing his limit in Iraq by involving in political solution during these protests and the responsive attacks by Iran on US air bases in Iraq, which can turn around the emotions in favor of the present regime of Iran. This ensures the dominance of the US on Iran and its stance of containment over Iran.

    Similarly, the dominance of the US over Iraq can be seen from the beginning. Paul Bremer, a US political diplomat, was the one who formulated the constitution and parliament of Iraq in 2003 after overthrowing the Saddam Hussein’s regime. Now, the parliament of Iraq decides to send back the US troops from Iraq and passes a resolution for it instead of passing a law. The US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, has rejected the demand of Iraq and confirmed that it will continue its mission of stabilizing Iraqi forces and it cannot withdraw its troops.

    It has been seen that whenever needed, the US executes joint operations with Iran to attack other Muslim countries and also lifts its sanctions on Iran during that time. This was evident during the joint operations in Syria. This shows that Iran shares a more friendly relationship with the US. Further, whenever the need arises to contain Iran, the US imposes sanctions or military actions like the recent ones. The US employs this option whenever Iran tries to cross the limits set by it. Therefore, the US uses appropriate actions at appropriate times in Iran. Therefore, nothing new happened in the present event but it is the continuation of the trend of appropriate action at the appropriate time. Further, Henry Kissinger, a US politician, used to state that there is no long-term enemy and there is no long-term friend for the US but it always cares for the betterment of the US. All these things show how the US treats Iran.

    Further, it is also necessary to know how Iran acts on all these things, with its own perspective, since Iran established its regime in the Middle East with the help of a deal between Ayatollah Khamenei and the US and also using the identity of Shiite, in their favor, till date. The main objective of Iran is only to maintain the regional influence in the Middle East. For that they fund and supply arms to Houthi in Yemen and Hezbollah in Lebanon and also support Bashar al Asaad in Syria. The scope and objective of Iran establishing a state was not on Islamic but purely on regional influence by exploiting Shi’ism in the Middle East region. Therefore, this state which is established with this limited scope can never ever function in the global sense or global political awareness as stipulated by Islam. So, Muslim Ummah must understand that Iran has never ever set the objective or the mission mandated by Islam.

    With this context, one of the lessons to be learnt by Muslim Ummah is that whenever any small group or political party in a region can have a deal with global super power to establish its authority over a state or form a new state with its authority, the group or political party or even the state which has a deal with the global super power is never ever going to be equal to that global super power in any way; instead, it will be under the dominion of that global super power and always be subservient to it. Further, no matter how obedient and how long these agents serve them, they can be thrown away whenever the US feels to do so if they don’t seem to fit in to their political agenda. As in the case of Qasem Soleimani, it is a pity that the current Muslim rulers don’t draw a lesson from it. But, the Muslim Ummah must know the reality that the ultimate end of those who serves the US is always the same.

    Similarly, the Muslim Ummah has to understand the difference between the actions and the rhetoric speeches of leaders of such states. For instance, Muslim Ummah perceives Iran as a super power which can face directly the US, the present global super power based on the open rhetoric speech of leaders of Iran, like “Death to US” and the actions like the responsive strikes over the US bases in Iraq. All these events are just an attempt to convince the people of Iran and remove the existing dissatisfaction. But, these actions actually did not create any kind of significant impact over the US. When Iran celebrates Qasem Soleimani as an important commander and mourns for three days for his loss by hoisting red flag but then the responsive attacks on US bases in Iraq were made only after all the people in those locations have vacated and claims that they did cast some damage to US. At the same time, they also openly express that they do not want war with US. From this, Muslim Ummah must understand that Iran established a state only based on regional influence and certainly not on the objectives of Islam. Even the structure of the government they established in Iran is also under the dominion of the US.

    Further, even if Iran wants to act independently in few things to fulfill their own interests, they are only in a position that they will be contained by the US through sanctions or military actions and that is the reality. This exposes the dubious mask of Iran and also the reality behind the killing of Qasem Soleimani.

    This reality is not only for Iran, but for all the Muslim countries that are ruled by the agents or slaves of the US. All such countries do not act like Iran but differently and within the regional influence. For instance, the actions of Saudi Arabia will be different and those of Turkey will be yet different but within the regional influence. They use few aspects of the systems of Islam, make open rhetoric speeches against their masters, conduct futile military strikes without any damage or impact to their masters to turn the opinions, emotions and sentiments of the Muslim Ummah in their favor and that is the real essence behind all these kind of events.

    Therefore, the Muslim Ummah, instead of falling to these kinds of agents with their dubious masks, must orient their thoughts, emotions, sentiments, aspirations and efforts for the reestablishment of rightly-guided Islamic Khilafah based on the Prophethood which can only solve all the problems of this mankind and keep all in tranquility. This can be the only attempt to continue the mission of our Prophet (saw) and to submit ourselves to the Lord of the universe Allah (swt) and seek His pleasure (ridwaan).

    Allah (swt) says:

    (وَلَن يَجْعَلَ اللَّهُ لِلْكَافِرِينَ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ سَبِيلًا)

    “And never will Allah grant to the disbelievers a way (to triumph) over the believers.” [Sura An-Nisa 4:141]


  • Understanding Hadith: Nothing turns back the Divine Fate (qadaa’) except supplication

    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

    Answer to Question

    How to Understand the Hadith

    «لا يَرُدُّ الْقَضَاءَ إِلا الدُّعَاءُ»

    “Nothing turns back the Divine Fate (qadaa’) except supplication”

    (Translated)

    Question:

    In the book At-Tafkeer Al-Islami, which is one of the adopted books, it mentions that supplication (du’aa) does not turn back the Divine Destiny (qadar) and does not change the Divine fate (qadaa’) or the knowledge of Allah (swt)). However there are texts from the Qur’an and the Sunnah that seem to me to contradict this understanding; it has been narrated that the Prophet (saw) said:

    «لَا يَرُدُّ الْقَضَاءَ إِلَّا الدُّعَاءُ»

    “Nothing turns back the Divine Fate (qada) except supplication.”

    There are other numerous Hadiths with this meaning, and they prove that supplication (du’aa) changes the Divine Destiny. So how can we reconcile between what is mentioned in the book and these texts? May Allah reward you with the good.

    Answer:

    I think you are referring to what is stated in the book Al-Fikr Al-Islami (Islamic Thought) and not At-Tafkeer Al-Islami which was a mistake in the question. Also another mistake in the question was stating that (it is one of the adopted books); it is not adopted and it is mentioned in the Administration file under (The nonadopted books that are published by Hizb ut Tahrir, whether they carry the name of the Ameer, or a name of another member for other considerations, and they are not taught in Halaqas (closed circles), and then it mentions from these books: (Al-Fikr Al-Islami (Islamic Thought)). In any case, as I mentioned previously, it seems that you are referring to what was mentioned in the book: (But it must be clear that supplication (du’aa) does not change what is in the knowledge of Allah, does not avert a Divine fate, does not take away the Divine destiny, and nothing happens without its cause, because the knowledge of Allah is inevitably accomplished, and Allah’s Decree will take place inevitably. If it was turned back by supplication (du’aa), then it would not be a Divine fate (qadaa’), and the Divine destiny is founded by Allah; therefore, it is not taken away by supplication (du’aa)). You said that this contradicts this Hadith:

    «إِنَّ الدُّعَاءَ يَرُدُّ الْقَضَاءَ»

    “Supplication turns back the Divine fate (qadaa’).”In another narration:

    «لَا يَرُدُّ الْقَدَرَ إِلَّا الدُّعَاءُ»

    “Nothing averts the Divine Destiny (qadr) but supplication.” Your question is how to reconcile this contradiction?

    Before I answer you, I will mention to you some related matters as an introduction to the answer:

    1- The status of supplication (du’aa) in Islam and response to it, by Allah’s permission. There have been verses and Hadiths on this subject, including:

    – Allah (swt) says:

    [وَقَالَ رَبُّكُمُ ادْعُونِي أَسْتَجِبْ لَكُمْ إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَسْتَكْبِرُونَ عَنْ عِبَادَتِي سَيَدْخُلُونَ جَهَنَّمَ دَاخِرِينَ]

    “And your Lord has said, ‘Call upon Me, and I will respond to you.’ Indeed, those who disdain My worship will enter Hell in disgrace.” [Ghafir: 60]

    – Al-Hakim narrated in his Mustadrak from Abu Huraira (ra) that he said: the Messenger of Allah (saw) said:

    «لَيْسَ شَيْءٌ أَكْرَمَ عَلَى اللَّهِ مِنْ الدُّعَاءِ»

    “There is nothing more noble to Allah than supplication (du’aa).” Ahmad narrated in his Musnad from Abi Saeed that the Prophet (saw) said:

    «مَا مِنْ مُسْلِمٍ يَدْعُو بِدَعْوَةٍ لَيْسَ فِيهَا إِثْمٌ وَلَا قَطِيعَةُ رَحِمٍ إِلَّا أَعْطَاهُ اللَّهُ بِهَا إِحْدَى ثَلَاثٍ إِمَّا أَنْ تُعَجَّل لَهُ دَعْوَتُهُ وَإِمَّا أَنْ يَدَّخِرَهَا لَهُ فِي الْآخِرَةِ وَإِمَّا أَنْ يَصْرِفَ عَنْهُ مِنْ السُّوءِ مِثْلَهَا قَالُوا إِذاً نُكْثِرُ قَالَ اللَّهُ أَكْثَرُ»

    “There is no Muslim who calls upon Allah with words in which there is no sin or severing of family ties but Allah will give him one of three things: either He will answer his prayer soon, or He will store it up for him in the Hereafter, or He will remove something bad from him that is equivalent to what he is asking for.” They said, “Then we should make a great amount of du’aa’.” He said, “Allah is greater.” It is also narrated by Al-Hakim in his Mustadrak from Abi Saeed (ra).

    These evidences show that Allah loves that His faithful servant supplicates to Him (swt) and increase his supplication, and that there is an answer to the du’aa by one of three as in the Musnad of Ahmad. And the response is recorded in Al-Lawh Al-Mahfouz (protected Decree); everything that takes place is recorded since eternity as shown in the evidence of the Divine destiny (qadar) below.

    2- If there is a definite evidence on an issue that indicates to a particular ruling and there is an indefinite evidence with Sahih narration (sanad) on the same matter that indicates another ruling in which there is a doubt (shubha) that contradicts the definite evidence, then in this case the two evidences are combined, because using the two evidences is more important than to ignore one of them. If it is not possible to combine the evidences then the definite evidence is taken, and the indefinite evidence is rejected in meaning (diraya) because its sanad (narration) is Sahih, but if its sanad is weak, it is rejected for its weakness.

    3- From the evidences of Divine Destiny (qadr):

    – Allah (swt) says:

    [وَكَانَ أَمْرُ اللَّهِ قَدَراً مَقْدُوراً]

    “And ever is the command of Allah a destiny decreed” [Al-Ahzab: 38]. The meaning of

    [قَدَراً]

    ‘Divine Destiny’ here is any matter that has been decreed in eternity, and the meaning of

    [مَقْدُوراً]

    is that it will take place inevitably. Therefore it means that it is a decreed judgment that must happen.

    [ومَا يَعْزُبُ عَنْ رَبِّكَ مِنْ مِثْقَالِ ذَرَّةٍ فِي الْأَرْضِ وَلا فِي السَّمَاءِ وَلا أَصْغَرَ مِنْ ذَلِكَ وَلا أَكْبَرَ إِلا فِي كِتَابٍ مُبِينٍ]

    “And not absent from your Lord is any [part] of an atom’s weight within the earth or within the heaven or [anything] smaller than that or greater but that it is in a clear register” [Yunus: 61]

    [عَالِمِ الْغَيْبِ لا يَعْزُبُ عَنْهُ مِثْقَالُ ذَرَّةٍ فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَلا فِي الأَرْضِ وَلا أَصْغَرُ مِنْ ذَلِكَ وَلا أَكْبَرُ إِلا فِي كِتَابٍ مُبِين]

    “[Allah is] the Knower of the unseen.” Not absent from Him is an atom’s weight within the heavens or within the earth or [what is] smaller than that or greater, except that it is in a clear register” [Saba: 3]

    [مَا أَصَابَ مِنْ مُصِيبَةٍ فِي الأَرْضِ وَلا فِي أَنْفُسِكُمْ إِلا فِي كِتَابٍ مِنْ قَبْلِ أَنْ نَبْرَأَهَا إِنَّ ذَلِكَ عَلَى اللَّهِ يَسِيرٌ]…

    “No disaster strikes upon the earth or among yourselves except that it is in a register before We bring it into being – indeed that, for Allah, is easy” [Al-Hadid: 22]

    – Also there are Hadiths on the subject of Divine destiny (qadr) or the writing on Al-Lawh Al-Mahfouz (Protected Decree), including:

    On the authority of Abu Huraira, he said, the Prophet (saw) told me:

    «جَفَّ الْقَلَمُ بِمَا أَنْتَ لاَقٍ»

    “The pen has dried after writing what you are going to confront” [Bukhari]; that is, everything you will face that which has been written in eternity for it.

    The Hadith of Umar from the Prophet (saw) about the arrival of Jibreel who asked about Islam and Iman; the Hadith states: “Inform me about Iman (faith).” He (the Prophet) answered,

    «أَنْ تُؤْمِنَ بِاللَّهِ وَمَلائِكَتِهِ وَكُتُبِهِ وَرُسُلِهِ وَالْيَوْمِ الآخِرِ وَتُؤْمِنَ بِالْقَدَرِ خَيْرِهِ وَشَرِّهِ»

    “It is that you believe in Allah and His angels and His Books and His Messengers and in the Last Day, and in fate (qadar), both in its good and in its evil aspects.” [Muslim] i.e., to believe that Allah has decreed the good and the bad before creating the creation.

    On the authority of Jabir, he said: The Prophet (saw) said:

    «لاَ يُؤْمِنُ عَبْدٌ حَتَّى يُؤْمِنَ بِالْقَدَرِ خَيْرِهِ وَشَرِّهِ حَتَّى يَعْلَمَ أَنَّ مَا أَصَابَهُ لَمْ يَكُنْ لِيُخْطِئَهُ وَأَنَّ مَا أَخْطَأَهُ لَمْ يَكُنْ لِيُصِيبَهُ»

    A slave (of Allah) shall not believe until he believes in Al-Qadar, its good and its bad, such that he knows that what struck him would not have missed him, and that what missed him would not have struck him.” [Tirmithi]

    On the authority of Abi Al-Abbas Abdullah Ibn Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them) that he said: One day, I was riding behind the Prophet (ﷺ) when he said:

    «يا غُلاَمُ، إِنِّي أُعَلِّمُكَ كَلِمَاتٍ، احْفَظْ اللَّهَ يَحْفَظْكَ، احْفَظْ اللَّهَ تَجِدْهُ تُجَاهَكَ، إِذَا سَأَلْتَ فَاسْأَلِ اللَّهَ، وَإِذَا اسْتَعَنْتَ فَاسْتَعِنْ بِاللَّهِ، وَاعْلَمْ أَنَّ الأُمَّةَ لَوْ اجْتَمَعَتْ عَلَى أَنْ يَنْفَعُوكَ بِشَيْءٍ لَمْ يَنْفَعُوكَ إِلاَّ بِشَيْءٍ قَدْ كَتَبَهُ اللَّهُ لَكَ، وَلَوْ اجْتَمَعُوا عَلَى أَنْ يَضُرُّوكَ بِشَيْءٍ لَمْ يَضُرُّوكَ إِلاَّ بِشَيْءٍ قَدْ كَتَبَهُ اللَّهُ عَلَيْكَ، رُفِعَتْ الأَقْلامُ وَجَفَّتْ الصُّحُفُ»

    “O boy! I will instruct you in some matters. Be watchful of Allah (Commandments of Allah), He will preserve you. Safeguard His Rights, He will be ever with you. If you beg, beg of Him Alone; and if you need assistance, supplicate to Allah Alone for help. And remember that if all the people gather to benefit you, they will not be able to benefit you except that which Allah had foreordained (for you); and if all of them gather to do harm to you, they will not be able to afflict you with anything other than that which Allah had pre-destined against you. The pens had been lifted and the ink had dried up”. [Tirmithi]

    4- Now we discuss the two Hadiths; that Du’aa turns back the Divine fate and in another version, it turns back the Divine destiny:

    – Al- Hakim narrated in Al-Mustadrak on the two Sahih from Ibn Abbas, from Thawban, that the Prophet (saw) said:

    «إِنَّ الدُّعَاءَ يَرُدُّ الْقَضَاءَ»

    “Supplication turns back fate (qadaa’)”In another narration by Al-Hakim from Abdullah Ibn Abi Al-Ja’d, from Thawban (ra), he said; the Prophet (saw) said:

    «لَا يَرُدُّ الْقَدَرَ إِلَّا الدُّعَاءُ»

    “Nothing turns back Divine Decree (qadr) except supplication.” Al-Hakim said: (this is Hadith has a Sahih Sanad, but they did not narrate it)

    5- By studying what is mentioned on the Divine destiny (qadr), especially the verses of definite in meaning, it is understood from this evidence that there is nothing on the earth or in the heaven except that Allah has decreed and recorded it with Him. Nothing takes place in existence except that it has already been decreed by Allah and is in His record. What is already decreed must take place and is inevitable, that is, nothing stops and prevents what is destined (qadr).

    It is understood from the aforementioned two Hadiths that the du’aa averts Divine destiny (qadr), or the fate (qadaa’). The meaning here is the same, so there is a doubt (shubha) that contradicts the definite evidence on the qadr, and as mentioned above, the first is to combine the two Hadiths with the definite evidence, if possible; otherwise, the meaning of the Hadith is rejected (diraya).

    6- Hence, after studying this matter, I say with Allah’s tawfeeq:

    A- The Hadith:

    «لَا يَرُدُّ الْقَدَرَ إِلَّا الدُّعَاءُ»

    “Nothing turns back Divine destiny (qadar) except supplication,” in the real meaning of the word (turns away qadr) i.e. removes it from Al-Lawh Al-Mahfouz (protected decree), this Hadith in this meaning is rejected by diraya (in meaning), because the decreed matter or destined is recorded in Al-Lawh Al-Mahfouz (Protected Decree), and it must inevitably take place and nothing will stop its happening , i.e. it will not be wiped out of Al-Lawh Al-Mahfouz (Protected Decree); therefore, the Hadith is rejected by Diraya (in meaning) if it cannot be combined (with the other Hadith), then the definite evidences on qadr are taken, i.e. the qadr must take place and is not averted. But before rejecting the meaning (diraya), effort must be exerted to combine all the definite and indefinite evidences, because using both evidences is of more priority than to ignore one of them.

    B- In the Usul (of Fiqh) when it is impossible to find the truth due to a qareena (indication), obstructing the real meaning, which here is the definite evidences on qadr mentioned above, therefore the metaphoric understanding of the Hadith is taken if it is possible according to the language. This is possible here; the word qadr or qadaa’ in the Hadith is in the metaphorical sense and is understood by its consequences i.e. its effect; in other words, what is caused by it due to causation, so it mentions the reason, but the meaning is what is intended, like if you say: (the rain grew the earth) and you mention the cause (rain) and mean the result, the product, (the plant), and here qadr is also mentioned but what is intended is metaphoric meaning, i.e. its effect or what is its result, and therefore the aversion is not to the qadaa’ or the qadr, but to their effect, for example, if a qadaa’ or qadr befalls a Muslim, like an illness or a loss of a child, a loss of money, and a loss of trade etc, then the du’aa turns back the effect, as in the Hadith of Al-Hassan Bin Ali (ra) he said: that the Messenger (saw) taught me to say words in the Qunut of Al-Witr:

    «اللَّهُمَّ اهْدِنِي فِيمَنْ هَدَيْتَ… وَقِنِي شَرَّ مَا قَضَيْتَ…»

     “O Allah, guide me among those whom You have guided … and save me from the evil of what You have decreed.” The believer, when he calls Allah in du’aa and increased the du’aa to protect him from the evil of the qadaa’, then Allah will ease its impact and help him to endure it and be patient upon it. Then Allah will make his life comfortable even after the qadaa’ has befallen on him. That is, Allah will ease the qadaa’ on him and lighten its impact. it is as if his du’aa has averted the qadaa’ metaphorically. That is, Allah has helped him to withstand the qadaa’ and gave him patience. How many men are injured by thorns, and they are weakened and shaken?, And how many men undergo disasters and yet their tongues are moist with the Zikr of Allah; a man supplicates to Allah to protect him from the evil of the calamity and its impact, and he is granted patience and his matters are straightened, as if his du’aa have averted the calamity metaphorically.

    Thus, it is understood that qadr is inevitable and must take place, but the du’aa of the believer sincerely and faithfully will avert the impact on him, i.e. the impact will be eased and he will be helped to endure it and have patience dealing with it, and to lighten the weight of the calamity on him, and then he will enjoy the life as if the calamity did not occur.  All that is recorded in Al-Lawh Al-Mahfouz; Allah has decreed it and knows it since Eternity. That is, it is recorded in Al-Lawh Al –Mahfouz, that it is destined that a calamity will befall on this slave and it will happen, and this slave will call on Allah (in du’aa) to protect him from its evil. Allah (swt) will respond to him and help him endure it and have patience dealing with it  as if it did not fall on him metaphorically.

    This is how the Hadith understood. this is what I see as stronger (in opinion) Allah Most Knowledgeable and Most Wise.

    7- For further information, I will mention the following:

    A- In my book (At-Tayseer Fi Usul At-Tafseer) it states:

    [Answering the du’aa (supplication) does not mean a change in fate or what is written in the Al-Lawh Al-Mahfouz (protected Decree) or in the knowledge of Allah, i.e. Allah’s response does not mean that He (swt) did not know about the du’aa of his servant and that Allah will answer it, and therefore is not recorded in Al-Lawh Al-Mahfouz, but rather Allah knows it and it’s recorded since eternity. Qadar is the knowledge of Allah, that is, what is written in Al-Lawh Al-Mahfouz and everything that will take place is written in it since eternity. Allah (swt) knows that someone will supplicate to Him. If Allah decreed to answer, it is written that someone will call in supplication with such and such and that this will be achieved with such and such. Du’aa is not a new composition that is not in Allah’s knowledge or not written in AL-Lawh Al-Mahfouz, as well as the response. Rather all that will take place is recorded in Al-Lawh Al-Mahfouz; Allah knows the unseen and knows what the servant does in word or deed, and everything is already written previously since eternity. Du’aa made by the servant is known to Allah and is recorded as it is. As well as His (swt) answer as desired by Allah (swt) is recorded since eternity. Du’aa and the answer are not above the knowledge of Allah, but they are recorded in Al-Lawh Al-Mahfouz as they are and as how they will happen. Allah is the Knower of the unseen and the seen

    [لَا يَعْزُبُ عَنْهُ مِثْقَالُ ذَرَّةٍ فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَلَا فِي الْأَرْضِ]

    “[Allah is] the Knower of the unseen.” Not absent from Him is an atom’s weight within the heavens or within the earth” [Saba: 3]

    B- It is stated in Sharh As-Sunnah by Abu Muhammad Al-Hussein Al-Baghawi Ash-Shafi’i (died 516 AH): [(Abdul Wahid ibn Ahmad Al-Malihi told us…from Abdullah Ibn Abi Al-Ja’d from Thawban, he said: The Prophet (saw) said:

    «لا يَرُدُّ الْقَدَرَ إِلا الدُّعَاءُ»

    “Nothing turns back Divine destiny (qadar) except supplication” …I said: Abu Hatim Al-Sajistani said (that one who continues to do du’aa (supplication) will accept the receipt of the qadaa’, as if it is averted)].

    C- It is stated in “Murqat Al-Mafateeh Sharh Mishkat Al-Masabih” by Abu Al-Hassan Nur ud-Din Al-Mullah Al-Harawi Al-Qari (deceased: 1014 AH):

    [His Saying:

    «لا يَرُدُّ الْقَضَاءَ إِلا الدُّعَاءُ»

    “Nothing turns back the Decree destiny (qadaa’) except supplication” Qadaa’ is the decreed matter … or he meant by “averting” of qadaa’ if he meant easing it and making the matter light, as if it has not been sent…]

    I hope that this is sufficient, and Alhamdulillah, Lord of the Worlds.

    16 Rabii’ Al-Awwal 1441 AH

    13/11/2019 CE

  • The World Oil Markets

    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

    Answer to Question

    The World Oil Markets
    To: Abdul Al-Aziz Almanis
    (Translated)

    Question

    Assalamu Alaikum Wa Rahmatullah Wa Barakatuh our precious Ameer;

    May Allah grant you a great powerful victory and establish the Khilafah by your hands.

    My question concerning the first reason (the world oil markets) leading to tension between America and Iran in the answer to the question: The Reality of tension between America and Iran in the region.

    How can the increase in the price of oil fit the cost of oil shale production?

    Doesn’t the increase adversely affect America? We have also seen Trump repeatedly ordering agents to cut production.

    Answer

    Wa Alaikum Assalam Wa Rahmatullah Wa Barakatuh

    Regarding your question:

    (How can the increase in the price of oil fit the cost of oil shale production?

    Doesn’t the increase adversely affects America, and we have seen Trump repeatedly ordering agents to cut production?)

    We explained the answer in our publication on this issue dated 12/7/2019, and perhaps it is available to you now, it contains a clear answer to your question, especially what is stated in it:

    (2. In order for coordination to become a reality on the ground, Saudi-Russian relations improved considerably after 2014, and on 4/10/2017 King Salman paid a visit to Moscow, the first by a Saudi king to visit Russia. Several meetings were held between the Russian President and the Saudi Crown Prince, and Russia was tempted by the possibility to direct the large arms contracts of Saudi Arabia towards Russia’s military factories, and thus, Russia and Saudi Arabia inaugurated a new era of oil relations between them. All this was in the era of America’s agent Salman and his son. The Saudi-Russian efforts were concluded on 30/11/2016 with the signing of the first agreement to reduce oil production between OPEC and 11 other countries, led by Russia, whereby OPEC has cut production by 1.2 million barrels per day, while the other 11 states reduced their production by 560 thousand barrels per day, and Russia’s share alone of this cut was 300 thousand barrels per day. Prior to this agreement, Saudi Arabia threatened to flood markets with oil, which encouraged Russia to coordinate with it for fear of dumping and price declines, thereby preventing financial hardship in Russia, whose budget is about 50% dependent on energy imports (oil and gas).

    3. This agreement had a positive impact on oil prices, and the price of a barrel of oil rose immediately after the signing of the agreement, but that agreement was for six months, followed by a long debate to extend the agreement. Russia, in general, especially as the oil price was good, wanted to increase its production to support its budget, while Saudi Arabia constantly wants to continue to reduce production as its fixed policy, although it threatens from time to time to give free reign to the market, i.e. threatening to significantly increase in production, and this threat has always been in the face of Russia’s attempts to end production cuts.

    In an open game for those who have sight, the US president asked Saudi Arabia to increase oil production to curb prices to encourage Russia to re-engage in production cuts with Saudi Arabia. Russia appears as if it is resisting the US president’s policy and fears Saudi Arabia’s response to him, so, Russia rushes forced to coordinate with Saudi Arabia to reduce production. As an example, [In a tweet on Saturday, Trump said that he spoke to King Salman bin Abdul Aziz and asked him to increase Saudi Arabia’s oil production, maybe up to 2,000,000 barrels, to stop its price rise and that King Salman had agreed to his request. (Al-Arabi Al-Jadeed 1/7/2018)] End quote.

    You can view the full answer for your benefit; it has the complete reply… and Allah knows Best He is Most Wise.

    And accept my greetings

    Your brother,
    Ata Bin Khalil Abu Al-Rashtah

    3 Dhul Hijjah 1440 AH
    4/8/2019 CE

  • The OPEC+ Charter


    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

    Answer to Question
    The OPEC+ Charter
    (Translated)

    Question:

    The Riyadh website published on July 9, 2019 that Saudi Arabia had played an influential role (in the agreement signed by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), along with other non-OPEC producers last Tuesday, and was named the “Vienna Alliance.”. Does this mean that a new organization was formed in place of OPEC? Is Saudi Arabia’s role in question self-motivated or externally motivated? What is Saudi Arabia’s interest in this alliance? For how long will this new alliance last? May Allah reward you.

    Answer:

    In order to clarify the answer to the above questions, we will review the following:

    First: The reality of the agreement:

    1. The 14-nation Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) has approved a charter of cooperation with 10 other countries, led by Russia, a major oil producer, in Vienna on 2/7/2019 during an OPEC ministerial meeting with those producers, and named the agreement “The Vienna Alliance / OPEC+” to be formally signed next fall during the planned visit of the Russian president to Saudi Arabia. The 24 countries agreed to extend the production cuts agreement in place for two and a half years for an additional period of nine months. This agreement was a process of documenting the relationship that has developed between Russia and Saudi Arabia (OPEC) during the past three years following the sharp fall in oil prices in 2014 after hitting a peak of $147 a barrel, and then continued to decline to $27 a barrel in early 2016; this was in order to try to control the movement of prices by regulating the supply of oil to meet global demand. During that period, Saudi Arabia led OPEC’s agreement with Russia to reduce production by 1.2 million barrels a day by OPEC, with Russia cutting its production by about 300 thousand barrels a day, and indeed the collapse of prices was halted and the price of a barrel rose to $55 after the agreement and it continued the upward trend during the past two years, which was considered satisfactory to oil producers.

    This new alliance of oil producers adds to OPEC important producers, such as Kazakhstan, Mexico, Azerbaijan as well as Russia, and makes the new alliance “OPEC+” control 47% of world oil production after OPEC alone used to produce about a third of world production i.e., it is supposed to significantly help oil producers in controlling oil prices. But this in theory, while in practice, many other things govern this agreement, including:

    a- This agreement did not cancel OPEC, but its members agreed with other producers, most notably Russia, that is, it is reversible. It is not a new alternative to OPEC, i.e. the OPEC Charter has remained in place, even if new states enter under the umbrella of “OPEC Plus”, and it is a voluntary agreement that the new states can exit from its charter.

    b- This agreement has been imposed on the producers by a new reality in the oil markets, the US shale oil, whose production continues to fluctuate up and down according to the price, and is not expected to stabilize before 2025. So, this agreement is likely to continue until the stability of shale oil production in the United States and its impact on the markets is clarified.

    c- Saudi Arabia is the most prominent among the OPEC countries to shoulder the agreement, which is a puppet state of America, and cannot move outside US policy, so the hand of America in this agreement is strongly concrete, and its agreement with Russia remains influenced by the developments of US policy.

    Second: The motives for this alliance:

    1. Since the collapse of oil prices in 2014, coordination between producing countries has become necessary to try to control the supply of oil in world markets, and thus control oil prices according to market requirements, i.e. in accordance with the theory of supply and demand. In the past decades, this has been done within OPEC, which is home to the largest oil producers, but in recent years Russia has become a giant oil producer and its production has increased by more than 11 million barrels per day, i.e. it produces 10% of the world’s production. Russia was monitoring OPEC; if it reduces production and hence prices rise, Russia would increase its production by taking advantage of high prices, as it is not bound by OPEC resolutions, and this has upset America, especially as it imposes sanctions on Russia. So, it tasked Saudi Arabia, OPEC’s largest producer and has a strong influence in it, to actively use the methods needed to create an alliance of some kind between OPEC and Russia to control Russia’s production within OPEC’s borders in accordance with the coordination between Saudi Arabia and Russia.

    2. In order for coordination to become a reality on the ground, Saudi-Russian relations improved considerably after 2014, and on 4/10/2017 King Salman paid a visit to Moscow, the first by a Saudi king to visit Russia. Several meetings were held between the Russian President and the Saudi Crown Prince, and Russia was tempted by the possibility to direct the large arms contracts of Saudi Arabia towards Russia’s military factories, and thus, Russia and Saudi Arabia inaugurated a new era of oil relations between them. All this was in the era of America’s agent Salman and his son. The Saudi-Russian efforts were concluded on 30/11/2016 with the signing of the first agreement to reduce oil production between OPEC and 11 other countries, led by Russia, whereby OPEC has cut production by 1.2 million barrels per day, while the other 11 states reduced their production by 560 thousand barrels per day, and Russia’s share alone of this cut was 300 thousand barrels per day. Prior to this agreement, Saudi Arabia threatened to flood markets with oil, which encouraged Russia to coordinate with it for fear of dumping and price declines, thereby preventing financial hardship in Russia, whose budget is about 50% dependent on energy imports (oil and gas).

    3. This agreement had a positive impact on oil prices, and the price of a barrel of oil rose immediately after the signing of the agreement, but that agreement was for six months, followed by a long debate to extend the agreement. Russia, in general, especially as the oil price was good, wanted to increase its production to support its budget, while Saudi Arabia constantly wants to continue to reduce production as its fixed policy, although it threatens from time to time to give free reign to the market, i.e. threatening to significantly increase in production, and this threat has always been in the face of Russia’s attempts to end production cuts. In an open game for those who have sight, the US president asked Saudi Arabia to increase oil production to curb prices to encourage Russia to re-engage in production cuts with Saudi Arabia. Russia appears as if it is resisting the US president’s policy and fears Saudi Arabia’s response to him, so, Russia rushes forced to coordinate with Saudi Arabia to reduce production. As an example, [In a tweet on Saturday, Trump said that he spoke to King Salman bin Abdul Aziz and asked him to increase Saudi Arabia’s oil production, maybe up to 2,000,000 barrels, to stop its price rise and that King Salman had agreed to his request. (Al-Arabi Al-Jadeed 1/7/2018)].

    4. Russia’s displeasure with the cut in production is confirmed by what was reported by Al-ain News on June 5, 2019, that Russian oil giant Rosneft’s CEO Igor Sechin said on Tuesday (the company was discussing possible compensation from the government in the event that a global deal to cut supply is extended. Sechin questioned the logic of Russia cutting output further as part of an extended deal, saying “the United States could raise production and take Russia’s market share”). In other words, Russia saw the reduction of production is not in its interest, but the threat of Saudi Arabia to increase production and flooding the markets and then decrease prices significantly which loses Russia’s benefit from increasing production due to the low financial intake from it, and the result is harmful to Russia because about half of its budget is from oil, so it agreed in duress to cut production! Thus, it increases prices to fit the export of shale oil, and this leads to the expansion of US oil companies. That is, Saudi Arabia is an American sword on the neck of Russia to push it to reduce oil production whenever America wants to.

    5. To understand the importance of reducing production to America, America today is different from yesterday’s America with regard to oil, as shale oil production has become a reality in the United States, and its production is constantly increasing, and its increase is vital to the US economy, which is suffering from a very high debt. This production and this increase need market conditions, especially the price, so the United States has assigned Saudi Arabia the task of reducing OPEC oil production, which on the one hand allows US companies to obtain market shares easily, and on the other hand maintains the price of oil high, i.e. economically feasible for producers of American shale oil. Shale oil needs the price of $ 69 a barrel to be feasible, but the development of its extraction technology has reduced this figure below that. America sees its shale oil as a way to take the superiority in the oil markets.

    6. The Saudi stick against Russia is the threat to increase production and push prices down, and the carrot is to delude Russia to gain more influence in the Middle East. King Salman paid a visit to Moscow in 2017, the first visit of Saudi king to Russia, and Saudi Arabia invited the Russian president to visit this fall, which is also a rare visit of its kind to Saudi Arabia by Russian president and the second ever. The Russian president was the first to announce the signing of the Vienna agreement after his meeting with Saudi Crown Prince Ibn Salman during the G20 summit held in Osaka, Japan on June, 29,2019, and (the Russian president told Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman that he was “happy to discuss cooperation between the two countries in the energy markets.” Putin added, “The strategic partnership within OPEC+ has led to the stabilisation of oil markets and allows both to reduce and increase production depending on the market demand conditions, which contributes to the predictability and growth of investments in the industry”). Putin announced [that “the deal would be extended in its current form and with the same volumes”, (Arabic Independent, 29/6/2019)]. All this delude Russia that it has influence in Saudi Arabia and within OPEC and on oil markets! In order to instil these false notions in the minds of Russians, the Americans delude the Russians of being dissatisfied with this agreement (Mr. Bordoff, who served as an energy advisor in the Obama administration said “The U.S. has enjoyed a dialogue with most of the key OPEC countries”, before adding: “Now you are bringing in, in a leadership role to the agreement, one of America’s foremost adversaries”. The US secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, when asked earlier this year whether the Russian president could use oil diplomacy to supplant the U.S. in the Middle East, he said: “I am very confident that Vladimir Putin’s efforts will fail.”).

    7. This is the reality of this Charter, and its motives, but as for it to last in perpetuity, this is unlikely because Russia is always trying to escape those restrictions and to benefit from the high oil prices by increasing production, especially as conditions in the near future may complicate Russia’s commitment to this, such as the trade war and its impact on oil prices, and the possibility of a return to stability in oil production in Venezuela, Libya and Iran, and its impact on the markets. In addition, Russia’s current proven reserves of oil will be depleted in less than 20 years according to the current pace of production, making it a race in time to try to reap profits during this not-long period, except if new oil fields are discovered. But this agreement could hold until 2025, the year in which US oil production is expected to stabilize, and is impact on markets is clearly defined, so Russia will be building its oil policy on those realities that remain so uncertain today.

    8. Finally, it is worth mentioning that the success of US policy behind the curtain of pushing Saudi Arabia with the stick of increasing oil production and the carrot of illusion of a new influence in the region to Russia, its success in pushing Russia to the OPEC+ Charter, all this will increase America’s hopes for the success of its other policy. The policy of pressure and sanctions with Russia to push it to serve against China, and if America’s hopes increase because of the success in the “OPEC Plus” plan, the American pressure against Russia will intensify, although America will add false carrot to deceive Russia, which is easy to deceive, until it obeys the American policy and becomes its servant in the vicinity of China. America has already begun that by asking President Putin during their meeting in Japan on the sidelines of the G-20 summit on June 29, 2019, to involve China in the Medium-Range Missile Treaty if Russia wants America to return to the treaty. Russia sees this treaty as vital to its security, so it will push China to accept. And because China rejects it as expected, then a crisis will arise between Russia and China, and this will facilitate Russia’s standing with America in the vicinity of China. For all this, the new “Vienna Alliance” to control the oil markets is an American trap for Russia, and America’s success has more strategic dimensions.

    9. Thus, the rulers in the Muslim countries have placed our wealth in the door of political games between the Kaffir colonial countries. If the interests of these countries required the reduction of production, those Ruwaibidhat would say “we obey”, and if their interests required increasing production, they also would obey. If their interests required to take our wealth cheaply, these rulers would agree with subjugation. If their interests require taking them at no cost under the pretext of protecting their thrones, as Trump announced, they would shake their heads, agreeing with gratitude that they protected their thrones!! And so they are in this world,

    ﴿صُمٌّ بُكْمٌ عُمْيٌ فَهُمْ لَا يَعْقِلُونَ

    “Deaf, dumb and blind, so they do not understand.” [Al-Baqara: 171]

    And in the Hereafter, they are blind and more astray in way, and Allah Almighty said the truth,

    ﴿وَمَنْ كَانَ فِي هَذِهِ أَعْمَى فَهُوَ فِي الْآخِرَةِ أَعْمَى وَأَضَلُّ سَبِيلاً

    “And whoever is blind in this [life] will be blind in the Hereafter and more astray in way.” [Al-Isra: 72[

    9th Dhu al-Qi’dah 1440 AH

    12/07/2019 CE

  • Nafsiya Reflections: The Coping Mechanism


    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

    Nafsiya Reflections: The Coping Mechanism

    In all societies today, there is a goal for success and measures of happiness linked to tangible things we attain in life.

    From birth through childhood – going to school, the certificates we get, the job, the house, the car and even how we would spend our retirement or old age, a picture of success is painted and people aspire to this. We are told that the years before we are ladened with family responsibilities are the years where we can have fun, travel, or do what makes a person feel good and then it is time to settle down.

    Mostly, this picture of ‘settling down’ includes – a spouse and 2 children, a nice house in the suburbs, holidays abroad and so on, all after going to a good university and getting a good job.

    However, during the course of getting to any goal, a person may face obstacles and forces that are not in their own control. A sudden illness, accident, or various other matters may affect the outcome of what we expect to achieve. When we’re in school, we’re not really taught how to manage these ‘hiccups’ in life not knowing why we have to experience particular emotions, or in fact why there is a test or problem in the first place, can at times spiral into feelings that will cause extreme anxiety, depression and heartache. When these discussions are not raised in an enlightened manner, the answer to ‘why?’ can become problematic as we get older. Those who are not able to meet the mark in the success that was defined for them, may feel that they have failed.

    The rates of depression in society, and the various stories of suicides of famous people are indicators of a growing number of people who were considered ‘successful’ by societal standards, but in reality, were extremely unhappy with the lives they led.

    So, when the going gets tough – what is the state of mind that is able to overcome harsh realities and deal with sudden loss, or even success for that matter?

    What is lacking in terms of thought, for today’s secular mindset? And does Islam say anything about the areas of life which are unknown or unseen to us?

    The tests of life, whether it is the death of a family member, loss of one’s possessions, illnesses and so on, are mentioned in the Quran and the Seerah. These lessons give us a way to reflect and to motivate man. The story of Ayub (as) going through every kind of loss and affliction is just one example, but many other prophets are also mentioned and their tests could be their disobedient families, mockery from their people, jealousy and rejection, illnesses etc.

    Through these examples, we are given a chance to relate and reflect upon the conceptual thinking that can be used as a tool to cope – whether it is the actions of worship to gain closeness to Allah (swt) or invoking HIM with particular Duas.

    So let’s talk about the concepts that form the ‘coping mechanism’ for a believer:

    There are many issues that are beyond man’s control. He cannot decide how long he will live and he cannot avoid disease altogether. He can’t control the wind, the rain, or an earthquake. He didn’t choose the family he was born into or even the colour of his skin.

    This sphere that is beyond man’s control, is termed as Qadaa, and it contains all the issues that we cannot change or control in any way. This concept is a fundamental belief and we need to develop the correct understanding towards it.

    The realisation of this concept helps us in accepting things that we cannot influence; and during times of hardship, a believer realises that Allah (swt) is the Ultimate in Might. So instead of dwelling on how ‘bad’ things are, the strong believer can see that their reality is a test and beyond their control, except the actions that they perform as a response to their trial. Hence, this concept makes one focus on what they are capable of, and what they can influence, thereby pushing them forward in a positive manner to fulfill their obligations.

    The lack of this crucial concept leaves one searching for answers throughout their life, like the one who wonders, ‘but why did this have to happen to me?!’. So unless one accepts the Divine Decree (the Qadaa) from Allah (swt), one cannot make sense of how to cope and move on.

    Another important concept is Tawakkul (trust in Allah) and is closely tied to the first one. This concept allows man to achieve things he could never have imagined. Just like when Musa (as) came to the sea while the army of Firawn behind him and the water was in front, and his people did not know where they would go. Just like when Ibrahim (as) was going to be flung into a fire that took months to build and would scorch the birds that cross the sky above it. Both these Prophets were assisted by Allah (swt) and they showed trust in Him.

    Likewise, in our lives, we have times where it seems like there is no way out or the obstacles are too high and we are just lost. But in these moments the one who remembers, Hasbi Allahu wa ni’mal Wakeel ‘Allah Alone is sufficient for me and HE is the best Disposer of all affairs’ – will find a way out.

    The clear concept of our rizq i.e all the things we use and benefit from in life – means when huge losses in wealth occur which we could not foresee or prevent, we remind ourselves “This is from Allah”

    When a close family member is ill and we have no way to alleviate their pain we remind ourselves, “This is from Allah”.

    When we just feel like our life is not going anywhere, we can stop, reflect and remind ourselves. “This is from Allah”

    Despite the concepts that can assist us, Muslims today, live in a secular capitalist society where the idea of submission to a Creator is detached from life’s affairs. The secular education system is devoid of any concepts that contextualise the trials of life, and do not link them to mankind’s purpose in life.

    On the contrary, secular society instills ideas in individuals, such as – ‘create the life you want to lead’, and when a problem strikes, a person’s first response is, ‘why me?’ and so on. There is no conceptual building about the ‘greater plan’ that the Creator (swt) has for HIS beings, and how HE loves those whom HE tests.

    Hence the eventuality where countless individuals fall into anxiety and depression. Of course, without concepts that drive our perspective in life, we can only just assess our trials on a superficial basis.

    Allah (swt) states a concept in Surah Al Baqarah that can build a very strong mentality.

    Bismillah Ir Rahman Nir raheem

    ( لَا يُكَلِّفُ اللّٰهُ نَفْسًا اِلَّا وُسْعَهَا ۗ لَهَا مَا كَسَبَتْ وَعَلَيْهَا مَا اكْتَسَبَتْ ۗ)

    “Allah does not burden a soul beyond that it can bear (Surah al Baqarah 286)

    Meaning, our tests can be managed with patience and perseverance. Undeniably, the concepts of Tawakkul, Rizq min Allah, Qadar wal Qadar and other vital concepts that form the backbone of a sound Islamic mentality – can only seep into the fabric of a society under an Islamic education system, as part of a comprehensive Islamic Khilafah rule.

    We pray to Allah (swt), to grant us the glory of Islam, which will restore the profound Islamic concepts in our lands – concepts that form the coping mechanism for life. Ameen.

    Ummah Voice Podcast

  • Trump’s Insistence on OPEC, Especially on Saudi Arabia, to Increase Production and Reduce Oil Prices

    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

    Answer to Question
    Trump’s Insistence on OPEC, Especially on Saudi Arabia, to Increase Production and Reduce Oil Prices
    (Translated)

    Question: On the 2nd of October, 2018, during the mid-term election rally in the constituency of Mississippi, Trump has threatened Saudi Arabia and showed his supporters that he was dealing with high oil prices: “…And how about our military deals where we protect rich nations and we don’t get reimbursed, how about that stuff “meaning oil”? That is changing too folks…We protect Saudi Arabia. Would you say they’re rich? And I love the King, King Salman. But I said ‘King — we’re protecting you — you might not be there for two weeks without us — you have to pay for your military.” (Khaleej Online, 03/10/2018).

    My question is not why the rulers of Saudi Arabia remain silent on this insult, rather they remain obedient to America, it is because they are small in their own eyes, and so they grew accustomed to humiliation. But my question is what makes Trump pursue Saudi Arabia aggressively to increase production to reduce the prices; even though America is the largest producer and can control the price reduction alone? So why is he insisting on escalating this now? And finally, why, despite all this American pressure the price of oil has not decreased? And may Allah reward you with the good.

    Answer: Yes, you said the truth, the one who is humiliated is accustomed to humiliation, Trump’s statements about the rulers of Saudi Arabia are enough to destroy the relations with America, if not above that, but that is if they were ashamed of Allah, His Messenger and the believers, but they are not ashamed, and the truthful Messenger of Allah (saw) said:«إِنَّ مِمَّا أَدْرَكَ النَّاسُ مِنْ كَلَامِ النُّبُوَّةِ إِذَا لَمْ تَسْتَحْيِ فَاصْنَعْ مَا شِئْتَ»“Verily, from what was learnt by the people from the speech of the earliest prophecy is: If you feel no shame, then do as you wish.”[Al-Bukhari]

    As for the answer to your question or questions, it is as follows:

    1. When Donald Trump took office in January 2017, oil prices were around $57 a barrel. By June 2017, oil prices had fallen to $45 a barrel, but have since continued to rise. Today, the price of oil is $86 on Brent crude and some analysts expect oil prices to reach $100 a barrel!

    On 5/7/2018, Trump wrote on Twitter“The OPEC Monopoly must remember that gas prices are up & they are doing little to help. If anything, they are driving prices higher as the United States defends many of their members (i.e. OPEC members) for very little $’s. This (relationship) must be a two way street (i.e we support you in return for a low oil price)…REDUCE PRICING NOW!” Before that on 30th of June 2018 he said in a tweet: “Just spoke to King Salman of Saudi Arabia and explained to him that, because of the turmoil & disfunction in Iran and Venezuela, I am asking that Saudi Arabia increase oil production, maybe up to 2,000,000 barrels, to make up the difference… Prices to high! He has agreed!” (Al-Hura: 30/6/2018)

    On 25/9/20/2018 the President of the United States of America attacked OPEC in his speech in the UN General Assembly and said:“OPEC and OPEC nations are, as usual, ripping off the rest of the world, and I don’t like it. Nobody should like it. We defend many of these nations for nothing, and then they take advantage of us by giving us high oil prices…we want them to start lowering prices… We are not going to put up with it, these horrible prices, much longer. (Sputnik, September 25, 2018), and on 27/9/2018, Trump wrote on Twitter “We protect the countries of the Middle East, they would not be safe for very long without us, and yet they continue to push for higher and higher oil prices! We will remember. The OPEC monopoly must get prices down now!

    As it states in the answer to a question on 2/10/2018 in the mid-term election rally in the constituency of Mississippi, Trump has threatened Saudi Arabia and showed his supporters that he was dealing with high oil prices: “…And how about our military deals where we protect rich nations and we don’t get reimbursed, how about that stuff “meaning oil”?  That is changing too folks…We protect Saudi Arabia. Would you say they’re rich. And I love the King, King Salman. But I said ‘King — we’re protecting you — you might not be there for two weeks without us — you have to pay for your military.” (Khaleej Online, 03/10/2018).

    All this means that Trump is interested, in the current conditions, in increasing production, but from OPEC, especially from Saudi Arabia.

    2. Yes, America is the largest producer, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), the US agency that collects energy statistics. At the end of 2017, the EIA published a timetable for world oil production, which was then 95 million barrels per day. According to the table, the seven largest producing countries are as follows:

    The United States: 14.46 million barrels per day of the total world production, Saudi Arabia: 12.08 million, Russia: 11.18 million, Canada: 4.87 million, Iran: 4.67 million, Iraq: 4.48 million, China: 4.45 million.

    America remains the largest oil producer in the world, followed by Saudi Arabia and Russia

    3 – And yes, America can increase production as it wishes, especially when it has a large stock of shale oil, but there is something that stops it from resorting to it:

    a -To Maintain its Stock and Reserves

    b – There are Ruwaibidha (base vile rulers) who implement its order even if they are insulted in this matter. They even implement this while it is harmful to them, as it is with the rulers of Saudi Arabia!! America is asking Saudi Arabia to reduce oil prices to provide its people the lowest prices after the price of Brent crude reached global benchmark of almost $ 80 a barrel in the ninth month of this year. “On 14/9/2018 global benchmark of Brent crude oil increased to become $ 78.21 a barrel, the highest rise since 22/5/2018″… (Reuters 14/9/2018). Note that “OPEC production rose to 32.79 million barrels per day. Saudi Arabia, which had promised a calculated increase in its production, said that the decision will translate into an increase in production by about one million barrels per day” (Reuters, 31/8/2018). “When Brent crude was heading towards $80 a barrel, Saudi Arabia informed the market of an increase in its production last month earlier than the date on which such information was usually disclosed,” quoted from the source.

    The Saudi regime is a strong American agent and in its service. Saudi Arabia has always played a pivotal role in stabilizing the oil market …  Saudi Arabia, needs high oil prices at this time, as its economy is under severe economic pressure since the oil price collapse in 2014. Especially since oil is the main revenue source in Saudi Arabia’s budget. It is common knowledge that in countries where oil revenues account for more than half of their revenues, they need oil prices above $ 80 a barrel to balance their budget – enough oil revenue to cover the budget expenditure – how is it then when Saudi Arabia’s budget is totally based on the oil revenues? The suitable price is above $ 80, even around $ 100 to balance its budget, and develop its economy, since it is now unstable.  However, its ruler agrees to increase production to lower prices, regardless of the harm done to the country to satisfy Trump, who publicly insulted the Saudi ruler, that had it not been for America, his throne would have collapsed!! They ignore this and their crown prince says that Saudi Arabia is ready to compensate for the Iranian shortage! Bloomberg News reported on 6/10/2018 statements of the Saudi crown prince Bin Salman: He insisted that Saudi Arabia has kept its promise to make up for lost Iranian crude supplies,” and he said: “Saudi Arabia is now pumping about 10.7 million barrels a day — close to a record — and can add a further 1.3 million if the market needs that…”

    As long as there is an agent of America who is willing to harm himself to achieve Trump’s desire of increasing production, why then should America use its reserves?

    4- Why is this insistence by Trump on OPEC, and especially Saudi Arabia to increase production and reduce prices? It is because there are two things that constitute an urgent dilemma for Trump that he needs to be solved quickly, otherwise Trump is not affected by the prices increase … America can absorb the increase by printing new dollars, as it did when the previous oil prices rose to about $150. We issued previously in the Answer to a Question on 16/5/2009: that America can print banknotes, with the approval of the International Monetary Fund or in secret, “even publicly” without its consent, as it has the effective influence in the Fund, and can show false reasons and hide the truth of the matter, and it can get the Fund’s support! But the printing of banknotes in this way leads to a devaluation of the dollar, and inflation, i.e. increase in prices. This is why America does not take this step unless it has vested interest. For example, it is reported that America printed between “2 trillion – 4 trillion” during the oil speculation, which caused the price increase to nearly $ 150 a barrel, “and America was not far from that speculation”. America printed these notes to buy the largest quantity of oil directly or indirectly to add it to its stock, it saw it as an interest above the high prices and the decline of the dollar …”but because it takes time to arrange the production of this “scenario”! And because the two issues need a quick solution or else Trump will fall in trouble as we mentioned earlier. Thus, Trump was furious with OPEC, and especially with Saudi Arabia … These are the two dilemmas:

    The first: the subject of sanctions on Iran:

    Iran is the third largest producer of crude oil in OPEC after Saudi Arabia and Iraq, its production is around 4 million barrels per day of crude oil. The sanctions will lead to a shortage of Iranian oil exports, especially in November, when sanctions are increasing including Iran as well as oil importers from Iran. America has asked companies to cut down on Iranian oil imports first, and then to cancel their contracts with Iran next November, which could lead to a reduction in Iranian exports. But Saudi Arabia can increase oil production if necessary, meaning it is prepared to compensate for the shortage of Iranian supply. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman said: “We export as much as two barrels for any barrel that disappeared from Iran recently,” the prince said. “So we did our job and more.” Saudi Arabia is now pumping about 10.7 million barrels a day — close to a record — and can add a further 1.3 million if the market needs that,” (https://www.akhbarak.net, 08/10/2018).

    On 4/11/ 2018, the United States plans to step up sanctions against Iran, targeting oil exports and pressuring governments and companies around the world to comply and reduce purchases from Iran. This means that the supply of oil will fall in the global market. As the statement of the seven largest oil producing countries mentioned above, Iran was producing more than 4 million barrels of oil per day “and this has now declined.” Half of the oil is produced, China and India and Turkey, receives from it nearly 2 million barrels. Trump expects the sanctions measures will remove these two million. America wants to compensate it through Saudi Arabia and other OPEC countries to compensate for the expected shortfall, so that America can address the issue of Iran away from Europe, Russia and China after announcing its withdrawal on 8/5/2018 from the nuclear agreement signed three years ago with these countries. It offers an agreement with Iran alone. The US president has announced his readiness to hold such an agreement, but the conditions must be created within Iran. This may take time … Trump wants to compensate for this shortfall until he can arrange an agreement between America and Iran without involving Europe, if the shortage remains without compensation and then prices rose, this will put him in trouble. Because he built the sanctions on the grounds that the lack of Iranian oil as a result of the sanctions will be compensated by his threats to OPEC, especially Saudi Arabia … In other words, America wants to address the issue of shortage of oil supplies and ensure that it does not rise until these problems are solved with Iran, because this may not be fast.

     Thus, Trump insists on OPEC and primarily Saudi Arabia to compensate for the Iranian supply shortage, which will be evident on 4/11/2018, in addition to the shortfall caused by the sanctions on 21/05/2018 imposed by Trump on Venezuela, even if it is less influential. Its current production is 1.5 million oil barrels per day.

    The second is the American elections:

    Rising oil prices creates a problem for Donald Trump, who will run the mid-term elections in November. High oil prices will keep his supporters in office, especially as most opinion polls show that the Democrats will control the House. To show the US voter that he puts America first, he puts the blame and pressure on Saudi Arabia and OPEC members to increase production. At the same time, The Trump administration is forcing China, India and Turkey to break ties with Iran and look for crude oil elsewhere. Rising oil prices also affect how much US consumers pay for petrol. With the US mid-term elections, this will not be a winning factor. The American people are sensitive to the rise in fuel prices, and cannot accept that their government is going to raise oil prices, so President Trump is blaming high prices on the Gulf States and OPEC and attacks them to show the American people that he is defending his interests and is able to pressure Saudi Arabia and OPEC to reduce the price. He is interested in lowering the price, especially in the US election period. This is necessary today for the US president and his Republican party’s need to get the votes of the American voters in the November 6th, 2018 mid-term elections, especially as opinion polls give preference to Democrats.

    5- Why do oil prices continue to rise despite the threat of Trump and its pressure and the response of Saudi Arabia? The reason is that there are other parties in OPEC that follow Europe and in conflict with America, and there is Russia also, and these parties, especially those linked to Europe, are not easy to respond to America except to the extent that does not achieve Trump’s ambitions as quickly as he wants it. Saudi Arabia is America’s main instrument within OPEC, but there are others in OPEC with certain interests, including those who follow large European countries, and may not obey America easily, as well as there are partner countries of OPEC as a Russia with certain interests. America cannot fully impose its will.

    In an attempt to lower prices, the president asked for increased production. However, OPEC and its producer allies did not reach an agreement in their meeting in Algeria on 23/9/2018 on an additional increase in oil production, contrary to Trump’s call.

     As for Russia, America succeeded in 2017, and until today to use Saudi Arabia to pressure Russia and embarrass it and respond to it in increasing production and then reduce prices … For the first time a Saudi king visits Russia to attend a meeting in October, 2017 between OPEC and non-OPEC members, especially Russia, In October 2017, king Salman visited Russia and attended the OPEC meeting. Oil prices then began to stabilize above $ 60 a barrel before rising since mid-year of 2018, as discussed earlier. However, Saudi Arabia and Russia struggled to meet the requirements of 2 million barrels per day requested by Trump. In fact, independent analysts as well as the International Energy Agency (IEA) suspect that Saudi Arabia and Russia could add 2 million barrels a day. The International Energy Agency (IEA), a Paris-based group representing consumer country, recently estimated what it called “short-order supplies” from the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia, at 1.14 million bpd.

    Russia could add up to 400,000 barrels a day, analysts say. In the end, under constant pressure from the United States, Saudi Arabia reached a secret agreement with Russia in September to boost oil production. “The agreement asserts that Russia and Saudi Arabia are increasingly deciding on oil production policies before consulting other OPEC members,” the sources said that Saudi Energy Minister Khalid al-Falih and his Russian counterpart Alexander Novak agreed during a series of meetings on lifting The production from September to December, with the price of crude oil at about $ 80 a barrel. The source said: “The Russians and Saudis agreed to increase oil pumping to the market quietly, so as not to appear to be acting on the orders of Trump by pumping more Oil.” Another source said:” The Saudi minister told the US Secretary of Energy Rick Perry that Saudi Arabia will increase production if its customers demand more oil.” (www.reuters.com).

    But perhaps one wonders why does Russia join America to curb high oil prices, even though high oil prices are in Russia’s interest? To answer this question, the scrutiny of this fact shows that Russia supports the price of oil at $65 a barrel, because this is the price of the balance of the Russian oil industry, high prices will make many importing countries unable to afford to buy it eventually leading to a collapse in the demand side, which would harm the Russian oil industry.

    In any case, Russia is not a big risk in this equation, but what really affect this equation is the pro-European OPEC members. It is not easy to implement what Trump is asking for except with greater pressure … However, prices are unlikely to rise to 100, since importing countries cannot handle it, and the demand will fall and then the rise stops and falls… Trump is interested in reducing prices during the election period and its annexes, i.e. by the end of the year when it is not unlikely that the subject of the nuclear agreement would have begun to move towards a new bilateral Iranian-American agreement without Europe, and America’s pressure on increasing production will end and so prices will revolve around $80 a barrel …

    What is painful is that foreign forces use the resources of the Muslim world to play games against each other, while our rulers the Ruwaibidha are blindly following these policies and without any respect for the dignity of the Ummah. Note that most of the world’s oil reserves are stored in the Islamic lands, whether in the Arab countries, Iran, in Africa, like Nigeria or Central Asia such as Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan or the Caucasus, like in Azerbaijan, but the country’s oil imports do not belong to its people, most of whom suffer poverty and destitution. The rulers, their families and their entourage plunder it and smuggle the money abroad. When America asked Saudi Arabia last year during Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia on 21/5/2017, the sum of 460 billion dollars the Saud family were ready to meet his demand and pay the amount. Therefore, Muslims are not saved from this tragic situation except by the guided Khalifah (Caliph) like Al-Farouq, Omar Ibn al-Khattab who distributes wealth to people fairly, and starts with the poorest people and ends with the Khalifah (Caliph), who is the last to take and eat. The Prophet, the truthful (saw) said:

    «كُلُّكُمْ رَاعٍ وَكُلُّكُمْ مَسْئُولٌ عَنْ رَعِيَّتِهِ الْإِمَامُ رَاعٍ وَمَسْئُولٌ عَنْ رَعِيَّتِهِ»

    “Each of you is a shepherd and each of you is responsible for his flock. The amir (ruler) who is over the people is a shepherd and is responsible for his flock “[Bukhari]

    He who deceives his people, his torment is severe as the Prophet (saw) said in the Hadith narrated by At-Tabarani in Al-Kabeer:

    «مَا مِنْ عَبْدٍ يَسْتَرْعِيهِ اللَّهُ رَعِيَّةً، يَمُوتُ يَوْمَ يَمُوتُ غَاشّاً لِرَعِيَّتِهِ إِلا حَرَّمَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ الْجَنَّةَ»

    “There is no person whom Allah has put in a position of authority and he dies on the day he dies cheating those under his authority, but Allah will forbid Paradise for him.”

    These are the Ruwaibidha rulers; little do they think and comprehend!

    11 Safar Al-Khair 1440 AH

    20/10/2018 CE

  • An examination of the issue of An-Nasr (victory)

    The following is the translation of an Arabic article.

    An-Nasr (victory) in its literal linguistic meaning is the assistance or help provided against another and according to the Shar’a meaning it means the assistance or help of Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla provided to his believing slaves against other than them from the disbelievers or against those who aggress against them or oppress them from amongst the Muslims. It is from the concepts of the Islamic Aqeedah. Indeed, it is from the most important of these concepts because of the great impact it has upon the one who believes in it. That is because the one who believes in the Nasr (victory) of Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla, makes him undertake acts which are difficult for him to surmount had it not been for his Imaan (belief) in the concept of victory.

    At the same time the concept of Nasr is considered to disclose or reveal the condition of the Ummah, the army and the group, because these three are not met by defeat at all if they fulfill the condition of Allah. That means that it is possible to pass judgment upon them in respect to them definitely being upon good as long as they continue to be victorious and not in a condition of defeat. As such the concept of Nasr has to functions: The motivation to surmount or breach the difficulties and to reveal the condition (of an entity) in respect to its soundness or well-being (on one hand), or its corruption (on the other).

    The concept of Nasr is from the concepts of sensitivity which much be understood completely as it is. That is because any intellectual perception for it which the person constructs himself without a Daleel, would make him subject to Fitnah. That could be for example when a particular Zaid from among the people is convinced of the Ummah’s victory whilst she is in a condition of corruption, and then the opposite occurs, leading perhaps to him being exposed to Fitnah in respect to his Deen.

    The Nasr does not come from other than Allah alone. He Ta’Aalaa said:

    وَمَا جَعَلَهُ اللَّـهُ إِلَّا بُشْرَىٰ لَكُمْ وَلِتَطْمَئِنَّ قُلُوبُكُم بِهِ ۗ وَمَا النَّصْرُ إِلَّا مِنْ عِندِ اللَّـهِ الْعَزِيزِ الْحَكِيمِ

    And Allah made it not except as [a sign of] good tidings for you and to reassure your hearts thereby. And victory is not except from Allah, the Exalted in Might, the Wise (Aali ‘Imraan: 126).

    And Allah Ta’Aalaa said:

    وَمَا جَعَلَهُ اللَّـهُ إِلَّا بُشْرَىٰ وَلِتَطْمَئِنَّ بِهِ قُلُوبُكُمْ ۚ وَمَا النَّصْرُ إِلَّا مِنْ عِندِ اللَّـهِ ۚ إِنَّ اللَّـهَ عَزِيزٌ حَكِيمٌ

    And Allah made it not but good tidings and so that your hearts would be assured thereby. And victory is not but from Allah. Indeed, Allah is Exalted in Might and Wise (Al-Anfaal: 10).

    And He Ta’Aalaa said:

    قُلِ اللَّـهُمَّ مَالِكَ الْمُلْكِ تُؤْتِي الْمُلْكَ مَن تَشَاءُ وَتَنزِعُ الْمُلْكَ مِمَّن تَشَاءُ وَتُعِزُّ مَن تَشَاءُ وَتُذِلُّ مَن تَشَاءُ ۖ بِيَدِكَ الْخَيْرُ ۖ إِنَّكَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدِيرٌ

    Say, “O Allah, Owner of Sovereignty, You give sovereignty to whom You will and You take sovereignty away from whom You will. You honour whom You will and You humble whom You will. In Your hand is [all] good. Indeed, You are over all things competent (Aali ‘Imraan: 26).

    Therefore, these Aayaat and those like them are Qat’iyah (definite) in their indicated meaning that the Nasr (victory) is from Allah alone, and this is a matter in which there is no room for debate.

    The victory can be for the Ummah, Jamaa’aat, the army and the individual. From among its manifestations for the Ummah is security, prosperity, honour and protection. Allah Ta’Aalaa said:

    لَقَدْ كَانَ لِسَبَإٍ فِي مَسْكَنِهِمْ آيَةٌ ۖ جَنَّتَانِ عَن يَمِينٍ وَشِمَالٍ ۖ كُلُوا مِن رِّزْقِ رَبِّكُمْ وَاشْكُرُوا لَهُ ۚ بَلْدَةٌ طَيِّبَةٌ وَرَبٌّ غَفُورٌ

    There was for [the tribe of] Saba’ in their dwelling place a sign: two [fields of] gardens on the right and on the left. [They were told], “Eat from the provisions of your Lord and be grateful to Him. A good land [have you], and a forgiving Lord” (Saba’: 15).

    And He Ta’Aalaa said:

    وَلَوْ أَنَّ أَهْلَ الْقُرَىٰ آمَنُوا وَاتَّقَوْا لَفَتَحْنَا عَلَيْهِم بَرَكَاتٍ مِّنَ السَّمَاءِ وَالْأَرْضِ وَلَـٰكِن كَذَّبُوا فَأَخَذْنَاهُم بِمَا كَانُوا يَكْسِبُونَ

    And if only the people of the cities had believed and feared Allah, We would have opened upon them blessings from the heaven and the earth; but they denied [the messengers], so We seized them for what they were earning (Al-A’araaf: 96).

    From among its manifestations for the Jamaa’aat is the provision of refuge, consolidation, security, support of the people and living after constraint or hardship. Allah Ta’Aalaa said:

    وَاذْكُرُوا إِذْ أَنتُمْ قَلِيلٌ مُّسْتَضْعَفُونَ فِي الْأَرْضِ تَخَافُونَ أَن يَتَخَطَّفَكُمُ النَّاسُ فَآوَاكُمْ وَأَيَّدَكُم بِنَصْرِهِ وَرَزَقَكُم مِّنَ الطَّيِّبَاتِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَشْكُرُونَ

    And remember when you were few and oppressed in the land, fearing that people might abduct you, but He sheltered you, supported you with His victory, and provided you with good things – that you might be grateful (Al-Anfaal: 26).

    And He Ta’Aalaa said:

    وَعَدَ اللَّـهُ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا مِنكُمْ وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ لَيَسْتَخْلِفَنَّهُمْ فِي الْأَرْضِ كَمَا اسْتَخْلَفَ الَّذِينَ مِن قَبْلِهِمْ وَلَيُمَكِّنَنَّ لَهُمْ دِينَهُمُ الَّذِي ارْتَضَىٰ لَهُمْ وَلَيُبَدِّلَنَّهُم مِّن بَعْدِ خَوْفِهِمْ أَمْنًا ۚ يَعْبُدُونَنِي لَا يُشْرِكُونَ بِي شَيْئًا

    Allah has promised those who have believed among you and done righteous deeds that He will surely grant them succession [to authority] upon the earth just as He granted it to those before them and that He will surely establish for them [therein] their religion which He has preferred for them and that He will surely substitute for them, after their fear, security, [for] they worship Me, not associating anything with Me (An-Noor: 55).

    And from its manifested forms in respect to the army, is prevailing over and defeating the enemy when meeting them in battle. Allah Ta’Aalaa said:

    كَم مِّن فِئَةٍ قَلِيلَةٍ غَلَبَتْ فِئَةً كَثِيرَةً بِإِذْنِ اللَّـهِ

    How many a small company has overcome a large company by permission of Allah (Al-Baqarah: 249).

    And He Ta’Aalaa said:

    فَإِن يَكُن مِّنكُم مِّائَةٌ صَابِرَةٌ يَغْلِبُوا مِائَتَيْنِ ۚ وَإِن يَكُن مِّنكُمْ أَلْفٌ يَغْلِبُوا أَلْفَيْنِ بِإِذْنِ اللَّـهِ

    So if there are from you one hundred [who are] steadfast, they will overcome two hundred. And if there are among you a thousand, they will overcome two thousand by permission of Allah (Al-Anfaal: 66).

    From its manifested forms in relation to the individual, is his prevailing over oppression against him and being saved from his enemy. Allah Ta’Aalaa said:

    وَكَذَٰلِكَ مَكَّنَّا لِيُوسُفَ فِي الْأَرْضِ يَتَبَوَّأُ مِنْهَا حَيْثُ يَشَاءُ ۚ نُصِيبُ بِرَحْمَتِنَا مَن نَّشَاءُ ۖ وَلَا نُضِيعُ أَجْرَ الْمُحْسِنِينَ

    And thus We established Yousuf in the land to settle therein wherever he willed. We touch with Our mercy whom We will, and We do not allow to be lost the reward of those who do good (Yousuf: 56).

    However, the individual could be tried and put to test by way of defeat and not be supported against the one who oppresses him, to make his rewards and recompense for that in the hereafter. Allah Ta’Aalaa said:

    وَمَن قُتِلَ مَظْلُومًا فَقَدْ جَعَلْنَا لِوَلِيِّهِ سُلْطَانًا فَلَا يُسْرِف فِّي الْقَتْلِ ۖ إِنَّهُ كَانَ مَنصُورًا

    And whoever is killed unjustly – We have given his heir authority, but let him not exceed limits in [the matter of] taking life. Indeed, he has been supported [by the law] (Al-Israa’: 33).

    The Imaan and undertaking the best action represents a cause from which arises the Nasr from Him inevitably, and it does not lag behind with the Ummah, the army and the Jamaa’aat, whilst it represents a Shart (condition) for the individual and not a Sabab (cause), as explained above.

    As for why the Imaan and the best action represents a cause from which arises the Nasr from him inevitably, then that is because Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla said:

    يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا إِن تَنصُرُوا اللَّـهَ يَنصُرْكُمْ وَيُثَبِّتْ أَقْدَامَكُمْ

    O you who have believed, if you support Allah, He will support you and plant firmly your feet (Muhammad: 7).

    And He Ta’Aalaa said:

    إِن يَنصُرْكُمُ اللَّـهُ فَلَا غَالِبَ لَكُمْ

    If Allah should aid you, no one can overcome you (Aali ‘Imraan: 160).

    And He says Subhaanahu:

    وَكَانَ حَقًّا عَلَيْنَا نَصْرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ

    … And incumbent upon Us is the provision of support (Nasr) to the believers (Ar-Room: 47).

    And:

    وَلَقَدْ سَبَقَتْ كَلِمَتُنَا لِعِبَادِنَا الْمُرْسَلِينَ ﴿١٧١﴾ إِنَّهُمْ لَهُمُ الْمَنصُورُونَ

    And Our word has already preceded for Our servants, the Messengers. [That] indeed, they would be those given victory (As-Saaffaat: 172-173).

    These Aayaat and those similar to them represent an explicit text indicating that Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla gives support or victory to those who support him from the nations, and the support of the servants of Allah, as is known, is only by Imaan and the best actions, i.e. by adherence to that which emanates from the Islamic Aqeedah in terms of Ahkaam, following Imaan. The Nasr (victory or support) of Allah to them is only manifested in one of the previous forms or all of them.

    The indicating meaning of the texts that the victory (Nasr) of Allah for the Ummah, army or group undertaking work, is Qat’iyah (definite) and not Zhanniyah (indefinite), and there is nothing within them which indicates linguistically to the possibility of the Nasr not coming. They include the promise of Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla, and the promise of Allah absolutely never falls back from being delivered or fulfilled. The promise is to the one who fulfilled the condition (Shart) of Allah Ta’Aalaa and not to his children or his children’s children. That is because if it did not come to him himself, then that would lead to making the promise of Allah hold no value to anyone who is addressed, which is impossible, as this clearly represents the linguistic indication.

    The meaning of this speech is that any Ummah which fulfils the condition that Allah has stipulated upon it, He will grant it Nasr inevitably. And consequently, any Ummah which is not victorious or supported (Mansoorah), then the meaning of that is that it is not fulfilling the condition which Allah Ta’Aalaa had stipulated upon it. The Ummah’s fulfilment of the Shart (condition) of Allah Ta’Aalaa dictates its Nasr and the Nasr of its army; indeed, the Nasr (victory) of the Jamaa’ah working within the Ummah. However, the defeat of the army in a battle or the group not reaching or accomplishing its objective, does not necessarily mean the defeat of the Ummah if it was compliant to the command of Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla.

    That is because the Muslims were defeated at the battle of Uhud but the Ummah was not defeated, their army was defeated at Mu’tah but the Ummah was not, and the Mu’tazilah failed but the Ummah was not defeated. The Ummah has lived this reality throughout its history and victory was its ally in every age and good was in it most of the time. And it also lived the opposite to it when it became distanced from Islaam. The defeat did not stay back from her when the Sharr (evil and bad) was prevalent amongst her and this matter is manifested in the Mantooq (explicit expressed meaning) of the Qawl of Allah Ta’Aalaa:

    إِن تَنصُرُوا اللَّـهَ يَنصُرْكُمْ

    If you support Allah, He will support you (Muhammad: 7).

    In addition to the Mafhoom (implicitly understood meaning) of the same Aayah which is that: “If you do not support Allah, He will not support you”.

    It is true that Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla says:

    نَبْلُوكُم بِالشَّرِّ وَالْخَيْرِ فِتْنَةً ۖ وَإِلَيْنَا تُرْجَعُونَ

    And We test you with evil and with good as trial; and to Us you will be returned (Mu’minoon: 35).

    If this speech is taken upon its generality, then it can be understood to mean that Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla tests the people by defeat whilst they are upon good as a Fitnah (trial) for them. However, this is not compatible here in respect to the issue of Nasr with the Ummah, but rather only applies upon individuals. That is because there is not one single text in which Allah has returned the defeat to the trial and being tested alone, as Allah has returned all of the defeats of the Muslims to spuriousness (or faults) in respect to the Muslims.

    The fact that Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla, explained the reason or cause for the defeat and addressed it represents a definite evidence (Daleel Qat’iy) for the correctness of what the Muslims believe, in respect to the victory (Nasr) being their ally or that it must always be their ally. As such, if the issue of the trial and being tested was possible, then the defeat would not have needed an explanation in respect to its cause. If, for the sake of argument, we were to suppose the possibility of the occurrence of the trial and test in relation to defeat in relation to the case of the Ummah, then a characteristic of the trial (Al-Ibtilaa’) is that it is extraneous and not permanent; temporary and not continuous. However, when we see generations being born, living and dying upon defeat, then that definitely is not reflective of a trial (Ibtilaa’) but rather a punishment that the people deserve.

    It may be that there is nothing more clear and evident in Islaam than this issue. Look at the His Qawl Ta’Aalaa:

     أَوَلَمَّا أَصَابَتْكُم مُّصِيبَةٌ قَدْ أَصَبْتُم مِّثْلَيْهَا قُلْتُمْ أَنَّىٰ هَـٰذَا ۖ قُلْ هُوَ مِنْ عِندِ أَنفُسِكُمْ ۗ إِنَّ اللَّـهَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدِيرٌ

    Why [is it that] when a [single] disaster struck you [on the day of Uhud], although you had struck [the enemy in the battle of Badr] with one twice as great, you said, “From where is this?” Say, “It is from yourselves”. Indeed, Allah is over all things competent (Aali ‘Imraan: 165).

    The Muslims were astonished by the defeat and couldn’t comprehend it. They asked how could defeat afflict them whilst they were fighting in the way of Allah and promised with His victory? And then Allah’s answer came to them: “Say: It is from yourselves” and that was due to the archers violating the command of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ. Allah did not condemn them due to their belief that victory would be attained or their belief that His victory was for them at their hands. He made the defeat return to the flaw within them as its cause, whilst He did not mention to them a matter named “Al-Ibtilaa’” (trial or test) in a situation or context that was in the utmost need of such an explanation.

    And look at His Qawl Ta’Aalaa:

    لَقَدْ نَصَرَكُمُ اللَّـهُ فِي مَوَاطِنَ كَثِيرَةٍ ۙ وَيَوْمَ حُنَيْنٍ ۙ إِذْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ كَثْرَتُكُمْ فَلَمْ تُغْنِ عَنكُمْ شَيْئًا وَضَاقَتْ عَلَيْكُمُ الْأَرْضُ بِمَا رَحُبَتْ ثُمَّ وَلَّيْتُم مُّدْبِرِينَ

    Allah has already given you victory in many places and [even] on the day of Hunain, when your great number pleased you, but it did not avail you at all, and the earth was confining for you with its vastness; then you turned back, fleeing (At-Taubah: 25).

    Allah Ta’Aalaa mentioned the victory he provided to the Muslims on many occasions or places, at the beginning of the Aayah, so as to make clear to them the correctness of Allah being their Naasir (the one who provides victory) and that He had realised His promise to them upon the ground reality, so that there doesn’t remain the least amount of doubt within them in respect to the promise of Allah. He then explained to them the reason for the defeat at the beginning of the battle (of Hunain) was only due to their statement: “We will never be defeated today due to having a small number” and so they had Tawakkaul (reliance) upon their ownselves and werer heedless, and if only for a moment, from their reliance upon Allah, a matter which went against the conditions of the attainment of Allah’s victory, and as such they were defeated at the beginning of the matter (i.e. battle of Hunain).

    And it is clear that Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla returned their defeat to the fault within them whilst He ‘Azza Wa Jalla did not mention the matter of the Ibtilaa’ (trial and test) in relation to the defeat or victory, not explicitly or implicitly, which indicates to the correctness of the belief of the Muslims in the necessity of victory being their ally (that accompanies them) from one perspective, and that it applies to those being addressed in themselves, from another perspective and not upon the generations that follow them, as long as they are fulfilling the condition of Allah, stipulated upon them, in terms of Imaan and undertaking the action in the best way or as it should be undertaken.

    As for the army, then the same applies to it as applies to the Ummah in respect to the Nasr (victory) and its Nasr is not examined far detached from the Nasr of the Ummah, as Allah does not give victory to an army of an Ummah which is not fulfilling the condition Allah has stipulated upon them. However, Allah has stipulated an extra condition upon it and upon the Ummah which prepares it, so that the victory is assured for it. That is for its strength of force (Quwwah) to be equal to a tenth of the power of the disbelievers as a minimum in the case or situation of the weakness of the Muslims and half the strength or force of the army of the disbelievers in the situation of the Muslim’s strength. Allah Ta’Aalaa said:

    إِن يَكُن مِّنكُمْ عِشْرُونَ صَابِرُونَ يَغْلِبُوا مِائَتَيْنِ ۚ وَإِن يَكُن مِّنكُم مِّائَةٌ يَغْلِبُوا أَلْفًا مِّنَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا بِأَنَّهُمْ قَوْمٌ لَّا يَفْقَهُونَ ﴿٦٥﴾ الْآنَ خَفَّفَ اللَّـهُ عَنكُمْ وَعَلِمَ أَنَّ فِيكُمْ ضَعْفًا ۚ فَإِن يَكُن مِّنكُم مِّائَةٌ صَابِرَةٌ يَغْلِبُوا مِائَتَيْنِ ۚ وَإِن يَكُن مِّنكُمْ أَلْفٌ يَغْلِبُوا أَلْفَيْنِ بِإِذْنِ اللَّـهِ ۗ وَاللَّـهُ مَعَ الصَّابِرِينَ

    If there are among you twenty [who are] steadfast, they will overcome two hundred. And if there are among you one hundred [who are] steadfast, they will overcome a thousand of those who have disbelieved because they are a people who do not understand. Now, Allah has lightened [the hardship] for you, and He knows that among you is weakness. So, if there are from you one hundred [who are] steadfast, they will overcome two hundred. And if there are among you a thousand, they will overcome two thousand by permission of Allah. And Allah is with the steadfast.  (Al-Anfaal: 65-66).

    Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla has therefore made it obligatory upon the Muslims to stand steadfast or firm in the face of the disbelievers is their Quwaah (strength or force) was equal to a tenth of the strength or force (Quwwah) of the disbelievers, in the situation of their weakness, and guaranteed victory upon them. Then He lightened from them for when their force is strengthened and made it obligatory upon them to stand steadfast and firm in the face of the disbelievers if their strength or force was equal to half the strength or force of the disbelievers’ army, guaranteeing the victory for them.

    The Mafhoom (implied understanding) is worked with by the scholars of Usool and the Mafhoom of the Aayaat obliging the steadfastness, indicates that it is not obligatory upon the Muslims to stand firm or steadfast in the face of the disbelievers, if their Quwwah (strength or force) was less than a tenth of that of the disbelievers in the situation of their weakness, and it indicates at the same time to the obligation of the Muslims working and striving to realise and obtain the tenth of the power of the strength of the disbelievers, when they do not possess that.

    Consequently, if the army of the Muslims meets the army of the disbelievers and its force or strength was equal to a tenth of their force or strength, and the Islamic Ummah on behalf of which the army is fighting has fulfilled the condition of the victory, then the victory of the Muslim army is inevitable, because Allah has guaranteed that. If defeat befalls them, then that means either the presence of a flaw in the army in respect to its Deen or in relation to the strength of the disbelievers, or a flaw in its Ummah, or in both.

    It is worth noting here that the Mafhoom (implicit understanding) of the number, in addition to that being linguistic and employed by the people of Usool, it is also employed or applied intellectually as well, and it is impossible for it not to be employed as such. That is because when Allah addresses the numbers themselves and a specific proportion, and affirms it and guarantees the victory with it, and then, after that, those numbers and that proportion have no value, the  that would lead to attributing pointlessness to Allah Ta’Aalaa in respect to having addressed those numbers and that proportion, and that is an impossible matter to attribute to Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla. That is because when He Ta’Aalaa says:

    إِن يَكُن مِّنكُمْ عِشْرُونَ صَابِرُونَ يَغْلِبُوا مِائَتَيْنِ

    If there are among you twenty [who are] steadfast, they will overcome two hundred (Al-Anfaal: 65).

    Then that means that ten steadfast will definitely not overcome two hundred and at the same time it means that the Muslims must strive rapidly to attain the proportion of a tenth. Any other view in respect to this matter represents nothing more than heresies which hold no value, because it would lead to attributing pointlessness to what Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla has addressed regarding the defined or specified number and proportion.

    As for the Jamaa’aat (groups) within the Ummah, then the Imaan and the perfection of action likewise represents the Sabab (cause) of the attainment or realisation of the victory for it. That is because Allah ‘Azza Wa Jallah has said in relation to them:

    وَعَدَ اللَّـهُ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا مِنكُمْ وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ لَيَسْتَخْلِفَنَّهُمْ فِي الْأَرْضِ كَمَا اسْتَخْلَفَ الَّذِينَ مِن قَبْلِهِمْ وَلَيُمَكِّنَنَّ لَهُمْ دِينَهُمُ الَّذِي ارْتَضَىٰ لَهُمْ وَلَيُبَدِّلَنَّهُم مِّن بَعْدِ خَوْفِهِمْ أَمْنًا ۚ يَعْبُدُونَنِي لَا يُشْرِكُونَ بِي شَيْئًا ۚ وَمَن كَفَرَ بَعْدَ ذَٰلِكَ فَأُولَـٰئِكَ هُمُ الْفَاسِقُونَ

    Allah has promised those who have believed among you and done righteous deeds that He will surely grant them succession [to authority] upon the earth just as He granted it to those before them and that He will surely establish for them [therein] their religion which He has preferred for them and that He will surely substitute for them, after their fear, security, [for] they worship Me, not associating anything with Me. But whoever disbelieves after that – then those are the defiantly disobedient (An-Noor: 55).

    Therefore, Allah Ta’Aalaa has made it obligatory upon the Jamaa’ah to have Imaan and undertake the best action or perfect the action (Ihsaan ul-‘Amal) and made that a certain Sabab (cause) in respect to it being granted succession (Istikhlaaf). Even though the Aayah was revealed upon the Muslims after the Hijrah at a time when they were in a state of severe fear from the disbelievers, where they did not go to sleep or awake except with their weapons in their hands, the ‘Ibrah (significance or purport) is not in the specificity of the Sabab (cause). The Aayah in its generality is valid to be applied upon the Jamaa’ah, the Dawlah and the Ummah, whilst there is nothing to specify it to any of them.

    As such, every Jamaa’ah which has made Ijtihaad in respect to that which is required from it according to a Saheeh (valid) Shar’iy Ijtihaad and undertakes that, then from the moment that it completes its Shar’iyah description as being a Jamaa’ah, the promise of Allah in relation to the provision of An-Nasr applies upon it. Then, if the members through whom the its Shar’iy description was fulfilled in respect to it being a Jamaa’ah die out without being provided the victory, that means the existence of flaws within the Jamaa’ah, which must be examined, investigated and revised. That is because the promise is not open until the Day of Judgement.

    Making the promise not be restricted to an end point means that the promise has no value or worth because every generation in the Jamaa’ah will believe, in such a case, in the possibility of accomplishing the victory or its non-accomplishment (i.e. it could happen and could not happen), which makes the promise hold no value for every generation, in addition to that making the concept of victory and its role or purpose redundant. From the angle of motivation or incentive, it has no value, in the case where the individual of the group believes that the victory could be accomplished just as it may not be. And also from the angle of what it reveals, because it does not encourage the Jamaa’ah (group) to revise its flaws, in the case where the promise is deemed to be remain open until the Day of Judgement.

    And so the Jamaa’aat were established and the members, through whom the groups Shar’iy description as being a Jamaa’ah was completed, have passed away, and they did not reach their objective and will never reach it and never be granted victory, unless they revise themselves and investigate the flaws which exist within them. What is meant here by flaws are those flaws related to the fundamentals of the Jamaa’ah. That is because the flaws in the branches do not prevent the reaching of the objective, but rather that it is only the flaws in the fundamentals which prevent the reaching of the objective.

    The Nasr (victory) of the Jamaa’ah is not examined in isolation to the Nasr (victory) of the Ummah. That is because the manifestations of the victory and its forms cannot possibly be reflected upon the individuals of the group without also being reflected upon others from among the people. The ‘Izzah (might or honour), scrutiny, elevation and Mana’ah (protective force) are all manifestations reflected upon the place or area which the group is victorious in. And these are not manifestations which Allah sends in postal parcels to the people, where it is imagined that that this person is ‘Azeez (honoured) in his house because he is from the Da’wah carriers whilst his neighbour is not because he is not from the Da’wah carriers, that must never be imagined.

    For that reason, the first of the manifestations of the victory of the group would be in the peoples’ support for it and their carrying of what they carry. If that happens then the group would have been supported (i.e. provided with Nasr) through the support of the people, and the people would have deserved the Nasr (support or victory) through their providing of it to the Jamaa’ah, and as such they would all be deserving of it. This represents the only angle for the Nasr (victory) of the Jamaa’ah (group) and this is what happened with the Nabi ﷺ. That is because he and his Sahaabah who believed with him deserved the Nasr and so Allah provided it to him; as soon as the support of most of the people was provided to him, and so they all being deserving of the Nasr of Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla, and then the Islamic State was established for them.

    The Messenger ﷺ and those with him were a Jamaa’ah (group) and the Nasr being provided to them was not delayed for generations. Most of those who carried the Da’wah alongside the Nabi ﷺ lived the victory and witnessed it with their eyes. When they asked him ﷺ to supplicate for them for the victory, he did not explain to them the issue of Al-Ibtilaa’ (being tried and tested), where there was need for it, but rather he reaffirmed and reiterated to them that the victory was coming. There would be no meaning to this reiteration and affirmation at all, if he had meant the victory of your children for instance or your grandchildren, and the Nafs (self) of those asking would not have found tranquillity apparat from as a result of what they knew in terms of that the victory was coming for them, themselves.

    As for the individual, then the Nasr (victory) for him is not inevitable or definite, even if his reward is preserved with Allah. That is because Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla said:

    وَاتَّقُوا فِتْنَةً لَّا تُصِيبَنَّ الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا مِنكُمْ خَاصَّةً

    And fear a trial which will not strike those who have wronged among you exclusively (Al-Anfaal: 25).

    Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla explains the possibility of a people being afflicted by a punishment where His punishment afflicts individuals who were not party to the sin. And the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: “The master of martyrs is Hamzah and a man who stood before the unjust Imaam, then commanded him and forbade him, and then he (the ruler) killed him”. The individual could be killed unjustly whilst not realising the Nasr of Allah and he could live in injustice or under oppression and not be granted Nasr from Allah, even though his reward is preserved to him in relation to all of that. That is because the evidences do not make clear the inevitability or definiteness of the provision of the Nasr to the individual. If He wills, He provides him with Nasr in the Dunyaa and if He wills he stores for him his reward until the Day of Judgement.

    The early Muslims during the time of the Nabi ﷺ and after that, comprehended the concept of An-Nasr according to its correct comprehension and it was clear in the minds with the clarity of the sun. With its role of providing motivation and revealing (i.e. the soundness of the work), this concept had the greatest impact upon their conduct. It transformed them from groups who had seen the greatest of accomplishments to be attacking or raiding others and taking possession of their properties, to a force which the whole people of the earth were incapable of stopping. That reached the extent that the Muslim army came to be known as the army which cannot be conquered. The concept of Nasr transformed them into a new creation through whom the greatest achievements in the entire history of humankind were accomplished, when they embraced it and worked in accordance to it.

    At the same time, they had benefited from this concept and understanding, in relation to their discipline with the commands of Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla. That is because defeat did not befall them except that they would go off searching for the flaw in relation to their compliance to the Deen of Allah ‘Azza Wa Jalla. They did not used to feel that they were on the upright path unless they were being victorious against their enemies from the disbelievers. Their state of affairs remained as such until the Islamic Aqeedah weakened within them and this understanding or concept (related to the Nasr) weakened alongside that. They became distanced from Islaam and so Allah enabled their enemies against them.

    The Nasr, like other Islamic concepts, has been exposed to vagueness in the minds of the Muslims, making it lose a lot its motivating and revealing role or purpose. The absence of these two roles or purposes had a great impact in respect to the decline of the resolve, shortcomings or neglect in respect to seeking the highest (aims) and seeking to beach the peaks of glory. As such the aims collapsed and the individuals and masses came to look no further than what lay between their feet. Its clarity, means amongst things, that at the time of defeat, that it is obligatory upon them to examine, first and before anything else, anything that is contrary to the command of Allah Ta’Aalaa and to then rid themselves of that.

    However, the reality of matters proceeded upon the opposite of that in respect to them. So, they wanted to get rid of the occupation by penetrating the patriotic movements established upon other than the basis of Islaam, and to resort and refer back to the disbelieving international organisations, and as a result the occupation increased in strength and might. And they resorted to entering parliaments and democratic paths to rid themselves of the systems of disbelief, and as a result the ruling systems gained complete control over them … and so on … Therefore, instead of ridding themselves of the Haraam, at the time of being inflicted by defeat, they submerged themselves further into it, and as such the defeat was confounded and increased many times over.

    Based upon the above, the effort to clarify the concept and understanding of the Nasr (victory) and generating it within the Nufoos (i.e. people) with its to purposes or roles of motivation and revealing or disclosure, is extremely essential and important. The carriers of the Da’wah must be attentive and alert to it, so that their Ummah quickly stands upon the right path that is obligatory for her to stand upon and before it loses who identity as an Ummah or Allah replaces her with others, and hence loses the Dunyaa and the Aakhirah.

    Sheikh Abu Islam Yusuf Shaqeero, Palestine

  • Taqleed (Imitation)

    All praise is for Allah, the Creator of humanity, the Lord of the earth and heaven, who created Adam (as), taught him the names of things, commanded the angels and Jinn to prostrate him (as) and honored mankind. Yet, Iblis was arrogant and he threatened mankind with seduction to evil. And Allah (swt) made this world a place of affliction and deeds, not the abode of eternal reward.

    He (swt) revealed Messengers and Prophets (as) upon mankind by His mercy. Their Seal (saw) was the best of the inhabitants of the heavens and the earth, and thus the blessed Message was completed.

    All praise is for Allah, filling the earth and the heavens… I bear witness that there is no god but Allah, in the witness that will save us by the Mercy and Forgiveness of Allah from His Hellfire. We ask Allah (swt) for steadfastness… I bear witness that Muhammed is the servant and Messenger of Allah (saw), the one who said, مَنْ يُرِدِ اللهُ بِهِ خَيْرًا يُفَقِّهْهُ فِي الدِّينِ When Allah wishes good for anyone He makes him understand in the Deen.” [Bukhari and Muslim]

    We are writing this subject since we see the need of many of the sons of this Ummah to understand this subject, as not every Muslim can arrive at the rank of ijthihad in the Knowledge of Shariah and thus he must imitate those who do. He is in need of imitation (Taqleed) to know the commands and prohibition of his Lord (swt), abiding by his Deen in deeds, words and in all of his life. 

    What made matters worse was the loss and absence of Shariah knowledge from the minds of sons of the Ummah. This is because of the loss of ‘Ulema. Muslim narrated in his Sahih: Abdullah b. ‘Amr b. al-‘As reported Allah’s Messenger (saw) as saying: إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يَقْبِضُ الْعِلْمَ انْتِزَاعًا يَنْتَزِعُهُ مِنْ النَّاسِ وَلَكِنْ يَقْبِضُ الْعِلْمَ بِقَبْضِ الْعُلَمَاءِ حَتَّى إِذَا لَمْ يَتْرُكْ عَالِمًا اتَّخَذَ النَّاسُ رُءُوسًا جُهَّالًا فَسُئِلُوا فَأَفْتَوْا بِغَيْرِ عِلْمٍ فَضَلُّوا وَأَضَلُّوVerily, Allah does not take away knowledge by snatching it from the people but He takes away knowledge by taking away the ‘Ulema, so that when He leaves no learned person, people turn to the ignorant as their leaders; then they are asked and they deliver Fatwa without knowledge, they go astray, and lead others astray.” People take ignorant leaders to give judgments with the loss of ‘Ulema, as those who remained from amongst the true ‘Ulema were deported, silenced and abducted. Thus there exists the loss of Shariah knowledge amongst the sons of Ummah.

    Nevertheless, the weakness in understanding Islam and the weakness of juristic capability amongst the sons of Ummah began with the lack of giving importance to the Arabic language. It then worsened through closing the door of ijtihad. It then worsened further still through the domination of the West and Kufr nations over Muslims, by usurping their authority. The kuffar struck the Ummah heavily in both the cultural and intellectual aspects. They worked for the faculties of “Shariah Sciences” to prevail over the Knowledge of Fiqh in the lands of Muslims, just as in the precedence of Western philosophy and logic (mantaq). They coerced the people of Fiqh and kept them away from the reality. So the knowledge of the faqeeh or sheikh (teacher) or student in the faculties of “Shariah Sciences” became for the sake of preaching and delivering sermons, and not for the sake of implementation, change and practically taking care of the affairs of Muslims. So the strength of Fiqh (jurisprudence) declined more than ever. Thus the ‘UIlema have decreased, whilst the imitators (Muqallids) have increased…

    Another problem arose, which is that of the imitator (Muqallid) who does not know how to imitate the ‘Ulema and does not know what are the regulations and rulings of imitation. He is ignorant of the obligations upon him as an imitator. He thinks that he could, as is erroneously said, حطها برأس عالم واطلع سالم “place the hukm on the neck of an ‘Aalim and look for the one who is sound.” 

    Amongst the most pressing problems in the subject of imitation during this era is that the community of Muslims are no longer giving importance to know the rulings, commands and prohibitions of Allah (swt). They do not examine them carefully, to the extent they start giving fatwas from themselves, making the commands of Allah (swt) subservient to their desires and interests. If you ask them, they would say, استفت قلبك ولو أفتاك الناس” “Ask for Fatwa from your heart, although people gives you fatwa.” They also say “The Deen is easy and not difficult, so do not make it complicated” or “The interest is so and so, and the Deen is to take care of the interests of the people” or “my intention is pure and what matters is the intention,” and other excuses by which they assure themselves, to escape from their responsibilities towards their Deen and Ummah! 

    Then, there are those who read two or three books and begin thinking of themselves as ‘Ulema of their time. They think that they are ‘Ulema who do not need to imitate anyone. Moreover, they think that it is a shame to imitate others, saying that they are knowledgeable and juristically competent. So they give fatwa from the book of Allah (swt) and the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah (saw), upon which they do not have knowledge. They misguide themselves and others! All of this necessitates the conveying of the thoughts that would enlighten those who are not mujtahids, upon how to take the ahkam of their Deen.

    From Allah (swt) the support is sought and upon Him alone is the trust.

    In this subject, we will discuss the various issues:

    First Issue: Definition of Taqlid (Imitation) and its Ruling

    Second Issue: It is upon the Muqallid to seek Fatwa from the One whom he knows is Knowledgeable and Capable of Ijtihad

    Third Issue: What does a Muqallid do in the Presence of more than one Mujtahid?

    Fourth Issue: Solving the problem of Scarcity of Mujtahids in our time

    Fifth Issue: Muqallid imitates a Specific Madhab whilst the People of his Madhab become Absent

    First issue: Definition of Taqlid (Imitation) and its Ruling

    Taqlid (imitation) is the acting upon the saying of others, without direct knowledge of the mandatory evidencing. It is the following by a Muqallid of the opinions of a Mujtahid ‘Aalim in the issue of jurisprudence (Fiqh), in order to act upon what the ‘Aalim said. He follows the opinion of the ‘Aalim because he trusts that the Aalim’s saying emerged from the evidence, which the Mujtahid examined. The Muqallid does not have to know this evidence, or the knowledge of the derivation (istinbat), ijtihad and the process of decision, whilst not even knowing what the ‘Alim mentioned, memorized and preserved. The Muqallid acts upon the action, without deriving the ruling from the Shariah evidences for himself.

    One who does not possess the capability for ijtihad, even if he gains some significant knowledge of ijtihad, must imitate one of the mujtahid and follow his fatwas (rulings) for practical issues. This is unlike the claims of some of the scholars from amongst the Mu’tazila and others. What we assert is indicated by the Divine texts and Unanimous Consensus of the Companions (ra).

    As for the divine text, Allah (swt) said, فَسۡ‍َٔلُوٓاْ أَهۡلَ ٱلذِّكۡرِ إِن كُنتُمۡ لَا تَعۡلَمُونَ  “So ask the people of the message if you do not know.”[TMQ 21:7]. The saying here is general about asking anything which one does not know.

    As for the Consensus, the general public during the time of the Companions (ra) of the Prophet (saw) used to ask mujtahids from amongst the Companions, about the practical Shariah rulings. Those of the Companions (ra) who were mujtahids responded to them, without a reference to the evidencing, whilst both the questioner and responder did not object to it. Amongst the evidence for this is the sound narration of As-Sha’bi (الشَّعْبِيُّ) who said, كَانَ سِتَّةٌ مِنَ أَصْحَابِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يُفْتُونَ النَّاسَ ابْنُ مَسْعُودٍ، وَعُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ، وَعَلِيٌّ، وَزَيْدُ بْنُ ثَابِتٍ، وَأُبَيُّ بْنُ كَعْبٍ، وَأَبُو مُوسَى. وَكَانَ ثَلَاثَةٌ مِنْهُمْ يَدَعُونَ قَوْلَهُمْ لِقَوْلِ ثَلَاثَةٍ، كَانَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ يَدَعُ قَوْلَهُ لِقَوْلِ عُمَرَ، وَكَانَ أَبُو مُوسَى يَدَعُ قَوْلَهُ لِقَوْلِ عَلِيٍّ، وَكَانَ زَيْدٌ يَدَعُ قَوْلَهُ لِقَوْلِ أُبَيِّ بْنِ كَعْبٍ “There were six amongst the Companions of the Messenger of Allah (saw) who used to give fatwa to people, they are: Ibn Masud, Umar bin Khattab, Ali bin Abu Talib, Zaid bin thabit, Ubay bin Ka’b (may Allah be pleased with them). Three used to attribute their sayings to the other three. Abdullah attributed his saying to (his father) Umar, Abu Musa attributed his sayings to the statement of Ali and Zaid attributed his sayings to the statements of Ubay bin Ka’ab.” Thus there is Consensus amongst the Companions of the Prophet (may Allah be pleased with them) for the permissibility of Taqlid (Imitation). 

    All of these statements in this issue are related to the imitation for the branches (furoo’). As for the imitation in the foundation of the Deen, the Aqeedah, it is not permissible as Allah (swt) says,  وَمَا لَهُم بِهِۦ مِنۡ عِلۡمٍۖ إِن يَتَّبِعُونَ إِلَّا ٱلظَّنَّۖ وَإِنَّ ٱلظَّنَّ لَا يُغۡنِي مِنَ  ٱلۡحَقِّ شَيۡ‍ٔٗا “And they have thereof no knowledge. They follow not except assumption, and indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all.” [TMQ Surah an-Najm 53:28]

    Second Issue: It is upon the Muqallid to seek Fatwa from the One whom he knows is Knowledgeable and Capable of Ijtihad

    It is permissible for a Muqallid to imitate only from the one who possesses the capability for making ijtihad, who must also be just (‘aadil). As for possessing the capability of ijtihad, this is because taqlid (Imitation) is the following of the opinions of others, without knowing the mandatory evidencing. This following is for the sake of knowing the Shariah ruling, whilst the Shariah ruling can be known only through scrutinizing and evidencing (istidlal) from the Shariah evidence. Scrutinizing and istidlal can only be done by a mujtahid. Therefore, it is the one whom people seek fatwa from must be a mujtahid, who is able to undertake derivation (istinbat) of the Shariah rulings, from the detailed evidence of Shariah (adillat tafsilyah).    

    As for being just, this is because justice is the condition for a witness. Giving a fatwa of the Shariah rulings is a witness from the Mufti that it is a Shariah ruling, derived correctly. Accordingly, witness is a condition that must be met by the one from whom people seek Fatwa.

    There is a question here: is it a must upon a Muqallid to ask the one whom he is seeking fatwa from, about his condition, in terms of his knowledge, capability of ijtihad and just before asking him the question?

    As for what is related to the capability for ijtihad, it is obligatory upon the Muqallid to ask the one whom he seeks fatwa from about his condition, before asking to take testimony of his justice from the Muslims, or by examining his authored works or the circles which the mujtahid takes. This is in the cases where the Muqallid possesses some significant knowledge about ijtihad, which enables him to verify whether the derivation of the ‘Aalim in his publications or knowledge circles is correct Shariah derivation. This matter is emphasized due to the nature of humans in general and in particular the condition of people in this time, as the majority of people are ignorant in the matters of Deen, being incapable of ijtihad and fatwa. If he does not ask about the justice of Mufti, then what most of the people think, most likely will be given.

    As for what is related to the justice (‘adl), it is also obligatory to ask about his justice, asking his people or those who know his condition or looking at his actions or listening to his talks to affirm that there is no apparent fisq (sin), or what blemishes his personality, or the insistence upon minor sins (sagha’ir), or other things that would subvert the justice of a man amongst Fuqaha. Amongst the things that would undermine the justice of an ‘Aalim is that he stands at the gates of rulers, glorifying them with praises and making haram as halal, for their sake. Such a person is not entrusted about the Deen, nor is he sought fatwa from. Instead, it is upon the Ummah to account him, exposing his stance, whilst the sons of Ummah should ask him to desist eloquently.

    Based on this premise, taking fatwa from councils, or taking fatwas from Dar ul Iftas without people knowing who gave the fatwa, or from taking fatwa from a group of muftis, gathering to give opinions and fatwa for a specific issue and then they issue fatwa to the people, all these contradict the rigorous procedures for Taqlid, as those who imitate (Muqallids) do not know the condition of those who gave them the fatwa, in terms of knowledge and justice.

    Third Issue: What does a Muqallid do in the Presence of more than one Mujtahid?

    It is upon the Muqallid to outweigh between the mujtahids. There are many criteria for outweighing (مرجحات) of muqallids that can be relied upon, to outweigh between the mujtahids. The most important of them is ‘a’lamiyyah (أعلمية being most knowledgeable). So, the Muqallid can outweigh the mujtahids and so he can imitate the one whom he trusts, that is the most knowledgeable amongst the mujtahids. It is not permissible for a muqallid to choose between ‘Ulema and mujtahids, based on his whims and desires. It is also not permissible for him to search for the easiest ijtihads and follow the lightest of ahkam. It is true that it is permissible for muqallid to imitate specific ‘Ulema for each separate issue. For instance, he can imitate Imam Shafi in the issue of Salah, and he can imitate Imam Abu Hanifa in the issue of fasting, and he can imitate Imam Ahmed bin Hanbal in the issue of Hajj. This is permissible on condition that his choice of ‘Ulema should stem from his trust in the knowledge (أعلمية) of each one of them, for the issue that he follows him in. It must not stem from whims and desires.

    Also, whilst it is permissible for the muqallid to imitate one of the Ulema for each separate issue, he can imitate a single ‘Aalim for all the issues of the Deen, such as to say “I imitate the Shafi madhab completely.” This is also permissible and there is nothing wrong in that.

    And the question that is raised here is: is it permissible for a Muqallid, when he imitates an ‘Aalim for an issue, or as for an entire madhab to revise his imitation, by imitating another ‘Aalim? 

    We say: It is permissible for that in every issue that is not connected to his current actions. For instance, if a muqallid says, ‘I will imitate Shafi’i for the issue of prayer and Zakah’, and then he prays upon the madhab of Shafi’i. However, he does not have wealth with him to reach the level of Zakah (Nisab) so does not adopt from Shafi’I in this. Then when his wealth reaches to the level of Zakah, he sees that Abu Hanifa is more precise for the ijtihad on the issue of Zakah. Then, it is upon him to imitate Abu Hanifa in the issue of zakah. 

    If the action of Muqallid is connected to the issue in which he imitates a particular ‘Alim, the Muqallid does not leave him. There are two types of Muqallids.

    Either the Muqallid is ignorant of the Knowledge of ijtihad and he is called Muqallid A’ami (general imitator) or he possesses some of the significant knowledge about ijtihad, although he does not possess sufficient knowledge that gives him the capability of ijtihad, and he is called Muqallid Muttabi’ (Following Imitator).       

    As for what is related to Muqallid A’ami, if he trusts the knowledge and justice of an ‘Alim, he will take rulings from that ‘Alim and imitate him. It is not permissible for him to turn aside from the ‘Alim to other mujtahids, even if he sees and trusts later in the a’lamiiyya (أعلمية) of another mujtahid. This is due to his ignorance of the knowledge of ijtihad and thus he is not able to outweigh the ‘Ulema and their capabilities of deriving the ahkam (istinbath). However, if the apparent fisq (sin) or the clear ignorance of the ‘Aalim is clear to this muqallid, which indicates the contradiction of the ‘Aalim with what the Muqallid affirms in the Deen, then it is obligatory upon the Muqallid to abandon imitating this man and start imitating another ‘Aalim who is trustworthy in his knowledge and justice.  

    As for what is related to Muqallid Muttabi,’ he can outweigh the a’lamiyya (أعلمية) of mujtahids. So he can leave from imitating what is better (المفضول), into imitating what is best (الفاضل), according to what he sees, from what he possesses from the knowledge of ijtihad, which enables him to judge upon the derivation (istinbat) of ‘Ulema and their evidence. Here, he has made judgment in outweighing and not judgment upon derivation (istinbath) in itself.  

    Fourth Issue: Solving the problem of Scarcity of Mujtahids in our time

    It happens today that if a Muqallid searches for a Mujtahid in his land to imitate, he will not find him. What makes matters worse are the borders placed by the colonialists between the lands of Muslims and the hard economic condition of Muslims, as it is difficult for a Muslim to travel and search for the ‘Ulema and mujtahids in the lands of Muslims.

    It has a solution, which is that the Muqallid should search in the books of mujtahids such as Shafi, Malik, an-Nawawi and others to find the solution for his issue. Or he should ask someone who has the knowledge of one of those madhabs, or the views of other mujtahids, so that he will give him the answer for his issue. Thus, the Muqallid can imitate the mujtahid, from whom the knowledge is transferred, and not from the one who transmits the knowledge from the mujtahid. The role of the transmitter is only to teach the Muqallid about the opinion of the mujtahid. There is no objection to this, provided that the muqallid is affirmed of the justice and trustworthy of the transmitter.

    Fifth Issue: Muqallid imitates a Specific Madhab whilst the People of his Madhab become Absent

    Consider a Muqallid imitates a madhab completely, and his current actions are connected to many of the issues that had been derived by the people of that madhab, who clarified its origin. Consider that this muqallid now travels to a place where he does not find any one from amongst the people of that madhab, or the people of that madhab become absent. In that situation, it is obligatory upon the Muqallid to continue his action, just as he acted before according to that madhab, in the issues that are already connected to his actions. As for the issues that are not yet connected to his current actions, there is nothing wrong for him to search for the ‘Ulema who are not in his madhab and thus he can imitate them. There is no difference in this with what we have mentioned before.

    There remains a problem in the issues which are connected to his current actions, which is the updating of the subsidiary (branch) problems for a muqallid, in the issues which he is already acting upon, according to the Madhab whose people are now absent. Here the Muqallid can ask any ‘Aalim in whom he has trust in his capability of ijtihad for this subsidiary issue.

    In the end, I have thought to limit the subject upon these issues alone as I have seen them as the most important issues needed by the imitators (Muqallids) of this time. 

    And Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the Worlds.

    Translated from Arabic

    Al-Waie Magazine, Issue 382, July 2018

  • Rising Oil Prices Benefits Everyone except Iran

    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

    Russia is covered by a wave of euphoria in connection with the rise in oil prices. On May 15, it reached $ 79.5 per barrel, for the first time since 2014. The Kremlin is thought to be inspired. A more detailed examination of the basics of what is happening is necessary.

    Rising Oil Prices Benefits Everyone except Iran
    By Usman Salikhov – Russia

    Russia is covered by a wave of euphoria in connection with the rise in oil prices. On May 15, it reached $ 79.5 per barrel, for the first time since 2014. The Kremlin is thought to be inspired. A more detailed examination of the basics of what is happening is necessary. This is due to the actions of the United States, which firstly withdrew from the nuclear agreement with Iran, which returned this country under sanctions, including on the sale of oil i.e. Iran is again deprived of the opportunity to trade oil. Secondly, it is an escalation from Washington in the Palestinian problem. The arrogance and perseverance with which the Americans are transferring their embassy to Jerusalem provoked protests from Muslims around the world. And in Palestine, with the suppression of Palestinians, the Jews killed about 100 people. And these two actions, which led to an increase in oil prices recently, are part of one plan to control the Middle East.

    1. Donald Trump, from the moment he came to the White House, clearly indicated his unceremonious in the matter of America’s borrowing money from other countries. So he demanded a lot of money from Germany for security: “Germany owes huge sums of money to NATO and the United States, and must pay more for the powerful and very expensive defense that we provide to Germany!” (RT, 19.03.17). And if he talks with the Europeans even summarily, but politely, then with the Islamic world, he speaks differently, haughty, arrogantly, humiliatingly. Speaking at a rally in Michigan on April 27, 2018, Trump said: “Imagine we spent 7 billion dollars in the Middle East without getting in return, nothing. We have finished with the “IG”, there is no such army as our army. “Some of the richest countries in the world tell us that they are tired and do not want to pay.” “We will make them pay, and they will pay.” And of course it’s about the countries of the Persian Gulf, Saudi Arabia.

    2. And this is the most important thing, because it is with the help of Iran that America frightens the Persian Gulf and demands money from them for their safety. It’s shocking and abominable how the enemies lead these Muslim rulers by the nose and frighten some by others, and make them love themselves.

    Back in 2012, the US Hilary Clinton signed an agreement with the countries of the Commonwealth of the Persian Gulf countries on the organization of an anti-missile defense system based on the Patriot missile system in conjunction with the global NATO missile defense system. But with Obama’s conclusion of the Iranian nuclear agreement, the problem of danger from Iran so will we say, and the missile defense project froze.

    And here it is important to explain that the conclusion of a treaty with Iran on the lifting of sanctions was aimed at supporting it in opposing the Syrian revolution. The removal of sanctions by the US allowed Iran to improve its financial position. In 2011-2013, the US was at a loss as to what to do with the uncontrolled revolution, which Obama said on August 6, 2016 about, that he was turning gray because of Syria. And Iran came to the aid of the US and throughout the war supported American agent Bashar Assad.

    However, in 2015, Damascus was on the verge of collapse, i.e. Iran could not withstand the onslaught of the rebels. And then the Americans started using Russia.

    Thus, Iran came out on the second role in the Syrian issue. With the advent of Turkey on the Syrian arena, the Americans in general managed to achieve significant progress in controlling the military side of the conflict. And instead of “rewarding” the obedient executioner, the US sending him into retirement, so the US “throw” the Iranian regime, declared it as a threat to security in the region and renewed sanctions against it. And now Iran has to deal with the financial holes in the budget because of military spending on Syria alone. This is the position of all traitors.

    3. Trump is seriously engaged in business in the state level. To reinforce the unheard-of loyalty of Saudi Arabia in the issue of security payments, he orderly and deliberately demonizes Iran, pointing to its nuclear and ballistic technology. So in his first international tour in 2017, which Trump began with Saudi Arabia, he held a meeting with the leaders of the Middle East countries and told them clearly: “Iran is your main threat, we (the Americans) will protect you and you will pay us.” And after breaking with Iran an agreement on the cessation of nuclear development and the resumption of sanctions Trump provides Erriad with support in the form of high oil prices. Moreover, in addition to the agreements on the supply of American weapons, Saudi Arabia agreed to fulfill the tasks set by the Americans in Syria. At the same time, high oil prices will give a powerful impetus to their own oil industry in the United States.

    To show the even greater role of business in Trump’s actions, it is important to point out Washington’s demand to stop the construction of a gas pipeline from Russia “Nord Stream 2”. Trump is trying to get Europe to buy liquefied gas from the US, which is much more expensive than a pipeline gas. The motive behind this threat is the transatlantic trade agreement. Washington threatens not to sign it, which promises America’s trade wars with Europe.

    And this business approach in public affairs leads the US to lose the role of a superpower, when the countries of the world turn away from them. So the Minister of Economy Altmeyer said 18. 05. 18: “Europe will resolutely respond to US attempts to put its own economic interests above the partners.”The US is our friends and partners, and we want to protect our common values, but if the US acts on the principle of America First and puts its own economic interests above ours, then Europe will identify its own interests and fight for them”. This statement shows that the ideological unity of America and Europe is lost due to the short-sighted rule of Trump. Who is seduced by the existing power and spends it on the benefits, losing the confidence of the allies. This is not the only disagreement between the US and Europe, and they are only worsening.

    4. As for the US embassy in Jerusalem, I must say that it’s not just about trying to raise the trump ratings inside the US. Israel over the past year has played a prominent role in the Syrian conflict. Air bombardments against Iranian and Russian military targets in Syria should have emphasized the presence of yet another military force opposing the revolution. The US prefers to remain in the shadow of their executioners, content with the role of the fighter with IGIL. And the Jewish entity’s statement in the role of another killer is destined to increase the desperation of the rebels. On the other hand, the attack of Iranian military objects in Syria emphasized the theme of the “Iranian nuclear threat”. And if America is a shepherd, then the Jewish entity is a sheep-dog, with the help of which she drove sheep’s to one more slaughterhouse.

    Translation of the embassy to Jerusalem is not only a rating event for Trump or a family issue with his son-in-law Jared Kushner. This is certainly something more. This of course is the hatred towards Muslims and their religion. The enemies of Islam are discouraged by what is happening in Syria and other clashes with Islam. They cannot understand the source of such a powerful resistance and the onslaught of Islam. So they are taking decisive steps, hoping to cut down the tree of Islam with its roots in the garden, it has grown. They produce beer with the Islamic shahada, instead of a lid. Enemies of Islam organize debauchery competitions on our lands, covering naked women with the testimony of Islam. They build theaters of opera and music in the land of two shrines. As for the third shrine, they show us that their boots will go where they like. So they want to deprive us of dignity and strength to resist.

    However, this religion belongs to Allah, and the fight against it is a great crime against the Lord Almighty, which will inevitably be defeated in this world. And no one has the right to despair and dwell on his way of spreading Islam. The days have come when the metal separates from the slag, and the truth from the lies.

    Every Muslim should sincerely rely on the help of Allah, who promised the establishment of a righteous Caliphate, the only shadow of which is covered with century-old dust deprives the current pharaohs sleep. O Muslims, join Hizb ut Tahrir. The Messenger of Allah (saw) said:

    «ثُمَّ تَكُونُ خِلَافَةٌ عَلَى مِنْهَاجِ النُّبُوَّةِ»

    “… Then the caliphate will continue by the method of prophecy.”

    * Written for Ar-Rayah Newspaper – Issue 186

  • What a Difference between Ramadan under the Khilafah and Ramadan under the Rule of Ignorance?

    How was Ramadan under the Islamic state in Medina and how did Muslims live it then? And how were the preparations of the Prophet ﷺ and companions after him for the blessed month? Were they like what we live today and what the existing countries are doing or is there a big difference? Questions that may have been brought to the minds of many, we will try, Allah willing, to answer them.

    Ramadan was obliged in the second year of Hijra (migration). The Islamic environment created by the Prophet ﷺ in Medina since his migration was able to make the first Muslims experience a unique taste for the month of fasting. They were used to living under the rule of Islam and they sacrificed what was precious for the sake of its call. When fasting was obliged, they saw it as an opportunity to take advantage of, to double the rewards and more giving at all levels.

    They worked hard and spent every effort following the example of the Prophet ﷺ; they stayed up in Qiyam at night and prayed during the day, asking for forgiveness, praising Allah, doing Tahleel and Takbeer, and showed most generosity; they spend in secret and public seeking Allah’s reward, and they would also hasten to meet the call of Jihad, rushing forth not away to spread the good to the worlds. The Prophet of Allah ﷺ, in his capacity as the head of state then, did not forget to seize the opportunities of obedience and sacrifices to move the army and expeditions as much as possible. And what more obedience greater than self-sacrifice for the sake of Allah, and what reward is comparable to that, that it should be missed as a worship in those few days. So Ramadhan was therefore the month of conquests and victories and in it was the expedition of Sayf Albahr and the great Battle of Badr and others.

    Because of that, the companions (may Allah be pleased with them) understood the meaning of fearing Allah (taqwa) very well. And they proceeded in the life obeying the commands of Allah and abstained from the prohibitions at all times, and hastened the good deeds and avoided the evil, but they avoided even a lot of Halal for fear of falling into Haram things until they attained piety (wara’), the highest level of taqwa. This also happened in the era of the Khulafa’ Ar-Rashidoon (righteous Caliphs), may Allah be pleased with them, and then in a pattern that rises in one time and descends in another in the shadow of the Khilafah and the abuse in the application until we have suffered the disruption of the rules of Islam.

    What we are living today is the absence of Shariah rules on the lives of Muslims. It makes us live a fundamentally different Ramadan than the first Muslims. It is sufficient proof that we have a pre-Islamic environment in our personalities to realize our need for an Islamic state, an honorable Khilafah on the method of Prophethood, that will take us back to our first state to taste the sweetness of the month of blessings, in which sanctifies will be protected and in it will be a call for jihad to spread the Deen of Allah in every house (made of mud or fabric).

    Every one of us senses the role of the state in providing the Islamic environment and the protection of society, and we see Haram spread everywhere, let alone in Ramadan and the States of destruction do not hesitate to bring anything that would alienate people from their Deen and belief; they are in an uncompromising war with the rules of Islam by exclusion, disruption and distortion, in addition to wanting to destroy virtue and what is rooted in people’s heart from shyness and piety and fear of Allah (swt) through the increase in the dose of fallen serials and programs calling for all evils of nakedness, obscenity, debauchery,  immorality and fornication and so on.

    With the intention to distract people and remove them from the atmosphere of Iman that strengthens their souls and makes them yearn for what Allah prepared for them, billions are wasted on what is not worthy. In return, the poor are left hungry, in need to feed their stomach with little food, if available to them. States spend millions on Ramadhan carnivals and allow the West to squander Muslims’ wealth. Muslims find themselves between the hammer of want and need and the anvil of fatigue and misery as Halal living is difficult and Haraam is easy and is facilitated.

    Thus, we fast but we see the concepts of secularism and kuffr and their rules dominating life, and we feel the pain that the political system, the economic system, the social system and the other systems of Islamic life are disrupted, which only by their application that we attain Allah’s pleasure and ensure a decent life, comfort and tranquility. We feel the pain but work to restore things to their rightful place as the balm and to remove the sin in front of Allah and really feel the meaning of the Hadith of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ: «يَأْتِي عَلَى النَّاسِ زَمَانٌ الصَّابِرُ فِيهِمْ عَلَى دِينِهِ كَالقَابِضِ عَلَى الجَمْرِ» “There will come a time when holding on to your Iman will be like holding on to a hot coal” [Narrated by Tirmidhi].

    The Islamic atmosphere that is generated by the Khilafah’s implementation of the rules of its Lord and its encouragement to the people to worship is important in order to ensure the Muslims turn to the law of their Lord and submit to him and be in the ranks of the righteous.

    The common tradition has a magical effect on the souls and has a great positive impact on them. Whoever takes a quick look at the history of Muslims will be aware of the important role of the state in smelting society with Islam and the importance of keeping it immersed in concepts, feelings and virtue, and the importance that the rules of Shariah laws are in force, to find the Islamic way of life. As Othman may Allah be pleased with him said, “What is not removed by the Qur’an is removed by the Sultan authority”.

    In other words, the authority of Islam forbids people from committing the prohibitions more than the Qur’an because “some” people are weak in Iman and are not affected by the deterrents and prohibition commands in the Qur’an. However when they see everyone around them committed and know that there is a penalty by the system, they will be deterred and fearful; the little number of those who publically carry out sins through the centuries of caliphate are proof of this as they were a small group.

    The facilitation of Haram and the fight against the rules of Islam, which is carried out by the states of destruction today, are what cause the existence of a segment of Muslims; who are Muslims by name only, they disobey Allah openly and do not hesitate to do all the Haram and they insolently call for all the evils and all that displeases Allah (swt).

    The existence of many of these is like the existence of the divine reason (I’la) that revolves with the reasoned law, in its existence and absence. Disrupting the Shariah law and the permitting the Haram, and the encouragement of the Western lifestyle are what fueled the mentalities and souls of those people and resulted in their separation from their Deen; many of them are unaware and we hope that they will return and repent to Allah (swt) when they know the reality of their Deen, its rulings and concepts.